From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 00:12:53 +0200 Message-ID: <87d0gpdjmi.fsf@gnu.org> References: <875znwcoo9.fsf@netris.org> <87pnm2ufv1.fsf@gnu.org> <87lfwpqpb7.fsf@netris.org> <875znt2hlc.fsf@gnu.org> <87zhke97xj.fsf@netris.org> <87h86mdaex.fsf@gnu.org> <8736i5a7mb.fsf@netris.org> <87mugdbc9r.fsf@gnu.org> <8736i3iyas.fsf@devup.no> <87zhkbhd07.fsf@devup.no> <87v9uz4msh.fsf@netris.org> <87woffh66h.fsf@devup.no> <874l26y9j0.fsf@gnu.org> <87d0guuwt4.fsf@netris.org> <87zhjw1gfm.fsf@gnu.org> <87a7bvnts4.fsf@netris.org> <87y2zfq746.fsf@gnu.org> <874l22of8l.fsf@netris.org> <87zhjuoarz.fsf@gnu.org> <87zhjumu88.fsf@netris.org> <87k1aym7kf.fsf@netris.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41534) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i36CZ-0007rj-30 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 18:14:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i36CX-0006xQ-Vc for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 18:14:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42529) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i36CX-0006xI-S8 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 18:14:01 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87k1aym7kf.fsf@netris.org> (Mark H. Weaver's message of "Tue, 27 Aug 2019 20:55:49 -0400") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Mark H Weaver Cc: 36747@debbugs.gnu.org Hi, Mark H Weaver skribis: > I pushed the revised commits to 'core-updates', but something seems to > have gone wrong with the new evaluation on Berlin: > > https://ci.guix.gnu.org/jobset/core-updates-core-updates > https://ci.guix.gnu.org/eval/7008 > > The first URL above shows a big "X" in the "Success" column for > evaluation 7008, which corresponds to the new commits I just pushed, to > switch to the new bootstrap tarballs. We had a Bison build failure: https://ci.guix.gnu.org/log/4rvzs59q3smm4kwyfnf7m58a48rql0fs-bison-3.4.1 Excerpt: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- make[1]: Entering directory '/tmp/guix-build-bison-3.4.1.drv-0/bison-3.4.1' make[1]: Entering directory '/tmp/guix-build-bison-3.4.1.drv-0/bison-3.4.1' rm -f examples/c/reccalc/scan.stamp examples/c/reccalc/scan.stamp.tmp rm -f examples/c/reccalc/scan.stamp examples/c/reccalc/scan.stamp.tmp /gnu/store/7fimyv3n4jn7nbyl5f5bzdhnm25qmk3m-bootstrap-binaries-0/bin/mkdir = -p examples/c/reccalc /gnu/store/7fimyv3n4jn7nbyl5f5bzdhnm25qmk3m-bootstrap-binaries-0/bin/mkdir = -p examples/c/reccalc touch examples/c/reccalc/scan.stamp.tmp touch examples/c/reccalc/scan.stamp.tmp : -oexamples/c/reccalc/scan.c --header-file=3Dexamples/c/reccalc/scan.h ./e= xamples/c/reccalc/scan.l : -oexamples/c/reccalc/scan.c --header-file=3Dexamples/c/reccalc/scan.h ./e= xamples/c/reccalc/scan.l mv examples/c/reccalc/scan.stamp.tmp examples/c/reccalc/scan.stamp mv examples/c/reccalc/scan.stamp.tmp examples/c/reccalc/scan.stamp make[1]: Leaving directory '/tmp/guix-build-bison-3.4.1.drv-0/bison-3.4.1' mv: cannot stat 'examples/c/reccalc/scan.stamp.tmp': No such file or direct= ory make[1]: *** [Makefile:6855: examples/c/reccalc/scan.stamp] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory '/tmp/guix-build-bison-3.4.1.drv-0/bison-3.4.1' make: *** [Makefile:6847: examples/c/reccalc/scan.h] Error 2 command "make" "-j" "8" "ARFLAGS=3DcrD" "RANLIB=3Dranlib" "V=3D1" failed wi= th status 2 builder for `/gnu/store/wwysm0mdkbvpyp3n4im5pfwcf2brc23p-bison-3.4.1.drv' f= ailed with exit code 1 @ build-failed /gnu/store/wwysm0mdkbvpyp3n4im5pfwcf2brc23p-bison-3.4.1.drv = - 1 builder for `/gnu/store/wwysm0mdkbvpyp3n4im5pfwcf2brc23p-bison-3.4.1.dr= v' failed with exit code 1 --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- I=E2=80=99ve addressed it by a hack in c55fae452032aa4b1b63406983e9abdf70ad= c957. > The second URL above returns "500 Internal Server Error". Bah, that=E2=80=99s another thing in Cuirass that we kind of fixed in Git b= ut we still need to reconfigure I guess. Ricardo, is that correct? > Is there a way to find out what went wrong? For evaluation failures, I simply browse /var/log/cuirass.log=E2=80=A6 Unt= il we have something better, we should maybe just publish that file. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.