From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id SLHQIewKDmHMLAAAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 07 Aug 2021 06:24:12 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id aIlVHewKDmHdAwAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 07 Aug 2021 04:24:12 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F444104FE for ; Sat, 7 Aug 2021 06:24:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:58636 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mCDsY-0000i5-Ha for larch@yhetil.org; Sat, 07 Aug 2021 00:24:10 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59580) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mCDsR-0000gF-3Y for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Aug 2021 00:24:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:40160) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mCDsQ-0008DI-Sh for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Aug 2021 00:24:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mCDsQ-0003Aj-NK for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Aug 2021 00:24:02 -0400 Subject: bug#48903: guix substitute: error: TLS error in procedure 'read_from_session_record_port': Error decoding the received TLS packet. Resent-From: Maxim Cournoyer Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2021 04:24:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 48903 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Mail-Followup-To: 48903@debbugs.gnu.org, maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com, maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com Received: via spool by 48903-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D48903.162831019912135 (code D ref 48903); Sat, 07 Aug 2021 04:24:02 +0000 Received: (at 48903-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Aug 2021 04:23:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51704 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mCDrj-00039e-42 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 Aug 2021 00:23:19 -0400 Received: from mail-qv1-f44.google.com ([209.85.219.44]:33789) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mCDrf-00039O-9T for 48903-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 Aug 2021 00:23:18 -0400 Received: by mail-qv1-f44.google.com with SMTP id em4so6095381qvb.0 for <48903-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 06 Aug 2021 21:23:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ejNcqC2C0sdtphIR+c8cv8vZAZPQmPUrTI4Ni1JuJ9k=; b=Bhid5ZurErMElEw8Gm5jeRPEf+Jo2AuJaNiTHGkiQhYWu+MRoHVVALK3gxjFvbtZQP Arvk8YUUBbsASn5LDpxqkH8W8Z0owfu9I80kbpPkWE6ejLRO4MU3pFwr7Es2EYtFPnqK VuCD0LqziKX5fI7BfPomt30GCLeHp+usZIY6jqFzVjFpKznT5iM1I5ajarwyQswx8hNB q1kMnN+6gsJCQckyzfXrMp8I4s9f/J54gPE9b8h9TFhDBlJMMeOQI8LFv3rQSpjE7nPT DMnYw0m1mCfLFy7vnMy2q52Rn0WEwXs5CZGFzyPRDb1ZtAxcfkfmUz3YX9SvQaybt0hb wraA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ejNcqC2C0sdtphIR+c8cv8vZAZPQmPUrTI4Ni1JuJ9k=; b=ru2GcZt6IB8Jrh++H6W8QsUQv/f9SRF+nn6WYXxtcgLc0fzsmptMAdk6eE7qPY08A3 hV5Ylj4zOe3M5BkQHFX0nItwvqEHK18ED0ZUBgzBlJS1fYAtcf8ia4a6VV3KpWmTiR6o DGJUGZrIFmt04+TJJYMds/92eh2qmCeqmDdGsC9BXuv09lELN2JJ2clSyrnku4pkGECl 0U/VjadwL/NSyZBLzNL8aoSy9v89XnZbxBHMnTbMqEtIKgh6v3mfmNDcn6/TNqrH1BnT XLdWRwKgOJdqIo5FGJDJNFM8TkAl3HjNwdJuR0ghqkzLDtV0YMkL6Y+uF+C/amHLvI/v m7UA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5308/5UlVt0pwHTA3KHzhXgERHm25Rz+wMSNViTzTtSAGztGw6vi EZ1woqLwGPmiIy7Xu34rQiRaxPPKMWoxgJQZ X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx2v3hysixvvsp1JeNgPAB2Ot7A0XzIhZmEyPpzFIyRGLe8erViKo16Bi5oVV0mhUqRYZohtQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:18c7:: with SMTP id cy7mr14240729qvb.59.1628310189659; Fri, 06 Aug 2021 21:23:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hurd (dsl-151-109.b2b2c.ca. [66.158.151.109]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g5sm968787qtg.28.2021.08.06.21.23.08 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 06 Aug 2021 21:23:08 -0700 (PDT) From: Maxim Cournoyer References: <87bl8hvhgx.fsf@gmail.com> <87wnr05tfz.fsf@gnu.org> <87o8bovm7t.fsf@gmail.com> <87sg10pdxs.fsf@gnu.org> <871r8j5nev.fsf@gmail.com> <874kdemb4k.fsf@gnu.org> <87h7hc3i6v.fsf@gmail.com> <87y2akspsh.fsf@gnu.org> <87pmvs52kl.fsf@gmail.com> <874kd2fp1y.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2021 00:23:07 -0400 In-Reply-To: <874kd2fp1y.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?="'s message of "Sat, 10 Jul 2021 12:20:25 +0200") Message-ID: <87czqpkhn8.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 48903-done@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1628310252; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-to: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=ejNcqC2C0sdtphIR+c8cv8vZAZPQmPUrTI4Ni1JuJ9k=; b=L2HawlRdOmtF+YNEFZS+uVcLj0jApvYZVIsSlis1g8IRifKjz2fW3n8MkmZzbM22SI28Yo Hxwkssc2tSEugCTbpL1EJUtuZvisS4C5MlbCckCcNUJ4AC+EyxwD68DkRYRJGsJRJ0SWDx a/MekTIgpcYZMicT3bzfOaXgT054aeEY1FVQ6p9vfTrN0fKx+ylfgCvnY7ziR9dQ0e0IqC 4q0unQ7VVoLpcaR8tWR61OvpaWiZN8cx9CdB/QhP6a9qIb165P6Qkjvg0uG3+Ptm5JPVyp RHjM3BBXLHJUBsUMzGSPkbLCXW0CUt7V7WwFOGnGj3AlDazuGbhXRXxQXM7t8A== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1628310252; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=BHvoy06iIf83Wue7u2tE8t/wlJ/lcrDYdyRMDy4h8JBha7SPeCUha53LLpZu8Kera/4wXX Uy9LuG2D+hfeUwRAHCY0unYLgJgQdAENpBBRym3JB7M5t+c2nOzKzIKitlhrY2wjMWU0Nr TQa8sjF41fpEJwR1PWZ97GZzC8lt+gr1+nsXEaWrFOHE+V1/pD0S7gNnzmWRZYauTAD0ci +5YTgggsuQ+DnwtYOW6iLV5PbmExGdT4FCLx/e3DdYCnF86ShgITISCdDRO49vzaqCzNUi ew3dPS9q8HcAr3u/cPhh0fG3lahxMPXmJBV6dik6cevqYxbyitwgfYcZ4Ips2A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=Bhid5Zur; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.32 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=Bhid5Zur; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 7F444104FE X-Spam-Score: -1.32 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: uS6v9bhYHVVz Hello, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > Hi, > > Maxim Cournoyer skribis: > >> I've tried some to reproduce the issue with the modified scripts below, >> but in vain. I'm not sure if my delay is inserted at the right place. >> I also suspect that my attempt to shuffle the substitute-urls is not >> really useful, as that's probably what would have happened anyway >> (although I haven't followed in the code deeply enough to confirm). > > Bah. :-/ Do the two of you still experience the bug initially reported > here in =E2=80=9Creal=E2=80=9D conditions? > > Are we sure we=E2=80=99re using the same Guix + Guile when running the st= ress > test and in real conditions? > > Thanks for testing! > > Ludo=E2=80=99. I've been doing builds on core-updates, which would previously trigger this problem rather often, *without* suffering from the problem. I consider it resolved. I'm not exactly sure how, which is not satisfying, but I'm glad it's gone. Thank you! Closing. Maxim