From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp12.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms5.migadu.com with LMTPS id KL9jAHPL52KsaAAAbAwnHQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 01 Aug 2022 14:47:47 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp12.migadu.com with LMTPS id MJ92AHPL52LPaAAAauVa8A (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 01 Aug 2022 14:47:47 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B51A5B482 for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2022 14:47:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:39310 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oIUpl-0007Gm-Se for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2022 08:47:45 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50582) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oIUp4-0007Fk-Hk for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2022 08:47:04 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49874) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oIUp4-0002Si-6V for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2022 08:47:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oIUp3-0002Eh-VZ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2022 08:47:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#56799: (gnu services configuration) usage of *unspecified* is problematic Resent-From: Maxim Cournoyer Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2022 12:47:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 56799 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Maxime Devos Cc: 56799@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 56799-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B56799.16593580168582 (code B ref 56799); Mon, 01 Aug 2022 12:47:01 +0000 Received: (at 56799) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Aug 2022 12:46:56 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39623 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oIUoy-0002EL-8y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2022 08:46:56 -0400 Received: from mail-qt1-f170.google.com ([209.85.160.170]:35565) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oIUow-0002E7-Nn for 56799@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2022 08:46:55 -0400 Received: by mail-qt1-f170.google.com with SMTP id g24so7883791qtu.2 for <56799@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 01 Aug 2022 05:46:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=ygn7xP0d8aGdMNrKEtQk/CT2CictMArJOpCADADiX9M=; b=NrHQcWcK31rWzxccK0kI5pOB/ZKAXkKcQf96MvwAX2SclU56cDxjs6VO5s58V1o68W 0e/FWFxfB86Oze4VbzOQKUawdZ2VG27zBKftS6mZi59Ckk9fItvHhuLqC6rVXryMlxft PLxgsZ3MC3qgD/pS/K/o79crP3TWlJKsc2Vw2bW1t65k+Y3LwulLz98ywnEZfdwSKj38 j8qkmo6Lf4M92lwRCXh6Yxv1dLDG1l+5ty1fNEDk4KbDWAOVNzUt/+kfik4BcbSv9Pe7 ckXYChhtbhztLZbKNkKNaJAZv/A1U2E8POc0WmuFOuwLSUJZlPiQ/hx7MzWoyZVlmP3f DgOQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=ygn7xP0d8aGdMNrKEtQk/CT2CictMArJOpCADADiX9M=; b=zcQb3VRC8CyO4vyNgHnCm4YOREzdc1ir+pKP3IJw1IudDBkuqccBknR3JidUqplaKH 3+uhexRN1freJFBsKwWFwnXCgjTndZudGZCmRTCKmkxD+X/Qme9pKPi2AAyzee+N+CJH KnwCRENpuo2etfRWHjghsN6x28P16Q+aZyYrcizSfTUgxj6RWMCrYjZ+sb9+luu/Dbwu zbrxv2Nzmrlnh+rC0UfaNXLXPrKj7+f1etYdPrkbwk+xWWug4pV1SSWu7TVRtIyPZe2p vyynp7il7GyXMvc8xTal/Yfaec1bsJKQ0RnwPFD0NN1/UpLvshUlV6e2OgfknEPINtee iVqw== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora9h+orLzeqmv/zkkMwwzbI6SHGbpnZS000HML6puZ+MaTRRNVlr kqbipgd3Kpjm955gmkHaGUPemd79ut8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1sduT0y7pLQJALVt9Etn8RoFA7wXzSPiDHOZXTlyRTTBFTyT28+Kpj3X/Z3WpyEqutpk9bheg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:1013:b0:31f:7b0:885d with SMTP id d19-20020a05622a101300b0031f07b0885dmr14180982qte.178.1659358008842; Mon, 01 Aug 2022 05:46:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hurd (dsl-158-240.b2b2c.ca. [66.158.158.240]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e4-20020ac84904000000b0031ee01443b4sm7026804qtq.74.2022.08.01.05.46.47 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 01 Aug 2022 05:46:48 -0700 (PDT) From: Maxim Cournoyer References: <877d3y8hjj.fsf@gmail.com> <20220728044144.15693-1-maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> <87mtco4kkw.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <24c7abd8-dbb3-8aaf-a7f8-5baa33fce48b@telenet.be> Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2022 08:46:46 -0400 In-Reply-To: <24c7abd8-dbb3-8aaf-a7f8-5baa33fce48b@telenet.be> (Maxime Devos's message of "Mon, 1 Aug 2022 12:00:34 +0200") Message-ID: <87czdk3zd5.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-To: larch@yhetil.org X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1659358066; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: dkim-signature; bh=ygn7xP0d8aGdMNrKEtQk/CT2CictMArJOpCADADiX9M=; b=R1UwyHoXAa99rqvuejf3YNgTDFTGKnLZm75lT+/iBqAjTKngeTzfHQV4aF4mmlhrx+mc5G eWYpgfdsvmcGzF4PfERfAP972zcnJZXMURRSLETg2L/x5tIBGULYNFg0FQwuFsb38ElFbr LYhSoxvsYm+aya55nZ+DIApJGR8YmubDsbCMuZUonqJO0lbg2wCxQ/pYw3uz2wS9DxgvZ0 pEB4qAxoApJhod9rhrkinfIFnviaS/8QIkm3Sy29aUvoT3VDMJ5JIqxvjMhhGXzkHK8/X9 dnBe6a3VJOVyx7G++V4UEJh9BYqbkFvRmpp4xtTNxUhcdE1IHWZ1Pso7WjycKw== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1659358066; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=Fkqd8bzWYyOdYzttuxfVA8F/egQoRtGhUyc22aJesB6sdXAdYE5cBP/c5v54yJn/i9+ZMp XPr5WM6FfMJHD85GZ4JFoaOoIZHmuye67xKM9ITiMOz3KHG9Gd5C5ARmnIy+JrZU7SqGPE oGVlFYoRCFimDFhDmxxjiYQ7CxoNTUVAtB+mFAlocR00+afnBI4zVdzogvh6QHda8zeOnY L1bGNJ3Vf7bOzJ+lCTl/iP5wuFptLDsAdIvLj2/peDIoGFNAH24jtS7/v+Z463Fb2JPNfs cJ5Uk+fT+g+pFBJa6dZD9pljPyIUNZa22XoiZ2mYBq9N9DVMoD3t+t9zHUhjdg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=NrHQcWcK; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 6.28 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=NrHQcWcK; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: B51A5B482 X-Spam-Score: 6.28 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: 3+ki4j0QhPRT Hi, Maxime Devos writes: > On 01-08-2022 07:08, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: >> (quote >> ("/gnu/store/14flr53fr0hs7mzfwn93kmyzrnb3fhjz-dummy-jami-account.gz")) >> (quote >> (*unspecified*)) >> (quote >> (*unspecified*)) > > These lines look suspicious to me -- should they have done (list > *unspecified*) instead of '(*unspecified*)? > > The former uses the actual unspecified object, the latter uses the > symbol '*unspecified*' that merely happens to be the name of a > variable the unspecified object is bound to. Indeed; '*unspecified ain't the same as *unspecified, and it isn't magically evaluated after being lowered in a G-exp: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- (map unspecified? (quote (*unspecified* *unspecified* *unspecified* *unspecified* *unspecified*))) $1 = (#f #f #f #f #f) --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- So in essence the idea to simply quote *unspecified* from patch v3 is flawed. v1 works though (using a symbol), so unless someone has a better idea right now I'm thinking that using 'unset instead of *unspecified* may be the simplest working solution. Thanks, Maxim