From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: Netpbm
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2013 23:06:47 +0100
Message-ID: <87bockygi0.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <201301191803.17290.andreas@enge.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58724)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1TwgYt-00006k-13
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Jan 2013 17:06:52 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1TwgYr-0002Hy-U3
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Jan 2013 17:06:50 -0500
Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.82]:29865)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>)
	id 1TwgYr-0002Hu-Nx
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Jan 2013 17:06:49 -0500
In-Reply-To: <201301191803.17290.andreas@enge.fr> (Andreas Enge's message of
	"Sat, 19 Jan 2013 18:03:17 +0100")
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
Cc: bug-guix@gnu.org

Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> skribis:

> Could someone else please test the package?

I just tried, and it builds perfectly as
/nix/store/agjc4rdsvi4wvbz6dymgid5pb85nqcf7-netpbm-10.61.01.

There are extraneous file in the root of that directory:

  $ ls /nix/store/agjc4rdsvi4wvbz6dymgid5pb85nqcf7-netpbm-10.61.01/
  bin/  config_template  include/  lib/  link/  man/  misc/  pkginfo  READM=
E  VERSION

Ideally, it=E2=80=99d be great to (re)move them.

As for the source tarball: could you add a comment that specifies from
which revision it was obtained?

(Eventually, we=E2=80=99ll have an =E2=80=98subversion-fetch=E2=80=99 metho=
d, in addition to
=E2=80=98url-fetch=E2=80=99, which could be used in such situations.)

Thanks, and congratulations given how painful it looked!

Ludo=E2=80=99.