From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: New to Guix Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2013 09:49:56 +0200 Message-ID: <87bo7mco2j.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20908.28905.25897.521567@Konrad-Hinsens-MacBook-Pro.local> <87wqqbe2yz.fsf@gnu.org> <20909.34134.149558.768854@Ordinateur-de-Catherine-Konrad.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41547) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ujm5E-0003cK-ND for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jun 2013 03:55:13 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ujm5A-0002zL-0L for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jun 2013 03:55:08 -0400 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([141.255.128.1]:42204) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ujm59-0002uY-Ng for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jun 2013 03:55:03 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20909.34134.149558.768854@Ordinateur-de-Catherine-Konrad.local> (Konrad Hinsen's message of "Tue, 4 Jun 2013 08:12:38 +0200") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Konrad Hinsen Cc: bug-guix@gnu.org Konrad Hinsen skribis: > > What would you like to package? (It would be great to discuss that to > > avoid duplication.) > > Stuff I use myself, meaning software at the intersection of "Python" > and "scientific computing". Unless someone is already working on it, > I'd choose NumPy as my first target. Python 3 would be another missing > piece I'd like to tackle. AFAIK nobody is working on these=E2=80=93otherwise speak out! ;-) > > Check this message [2] as well. It would be great to stick to the pla= n, > > but it's not mandatory. > > That plan sounds reasonable, but I have no competence with that kind > of software. I'd rather start with packages that I know very well, to > the point of having contributed to their development. Yes, that makes sense. Part of the plan for 0.3 is just =E2=80=9Cmore packages=E2=80=9D, broadly. > Right now, my goal is "learn Guix", with package definitions produced > as a side effect. That's how side effects sneak into purely functional > package management ;-) Aah! :-) Ludo=E2=80=99.