From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: bug#25598: R packages are not bit-reproducible Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2017 14:00:25 +0100 Message-ID: <87bmumcbh2.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8737fydyma.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33641) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cYuX4-0004QS-Eg for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2017 08:01:12 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cYuX0-0000Of-31 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2017 08:01:06 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:54714) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cYuWz-0000Ob-Vu for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2017 08:01:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cYuWz-0000ps-Os for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2017 08:01:01 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: (Ricardo Wurmus's message of "Wed, 1 Feb 2017 12:08:45 +0100") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: 25598@debbugs.gnu.org Hi! Ricardo Wurmus skribis: > From fa42971cb7099e3b370565de5d3f454faecf0369 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Ricardo Wurmus > Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 11:42:34 +0100 > Subject: [PATCH] build: r-build-system: Use deterministic built date. > > Fixes . > > * guix/build/r-build-system.scm (install): Pass "--built-timestamp" > option to make build deterministic. Great. I think it=E2=80=99s fine for master, that=E2=80=99s 276 packages b= ut they don=E2=80=99t take long to build. Does that also help with the .rds discrepancies? Thank you for the super-fast reply! Ludo=E2=80=99.