From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark H Weaver Subject: bug#27429: Stack clash (CVE-2017-1000366 etc) Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 16:03:24 -0400 Message-ID: <87bmpeh3oz.fsf@netris.org> References: <20170619222550.GA29289@jasmine.lan> <20170620004920.GB31586@jasmine.lan> <20170620071857.GA2768@macbook42.flashner.co.il> <87shiumj05.fsf@netris.org> <20170621084134.GA2870@macbook42.flashner.co.il> <20170621095045.GB2870@macbook42.flashner.co.il> <20170623172038.GA6052@jasmine.lan> <87mv8yh7pi.fsf@netris.org> <20170623185448.GA14284@jasmine.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60784) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dOUoH-0004ri-G0 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 16:04:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dOUoE-0007Ze-CF for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 16:04:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:60332) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dOUoE-0007Z7-8a for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 16:04:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20170623185448.GA14284@jasmine.lan> (Leo Famulari's message of "Fri, 23 Jun 2017 14:54:48 -0400") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Leo Famulari Cc: 27429@debbugs.gnu.org Leo Famulari writes: > On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 02:36:41PM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote: >> Most packages are linked with 'glibc-final' in (gnu packages >> commencement), and we should expect them to now be linked with *its* >> replacement. Try this to find the expected glibc-final replacement: >> >> ./pre-inst-env guix build -e '((@@ (guix packages) package-replacement) (@@ (gnu packages commencement) glibc-final))' > > Thank you for the clarification. Indeed, with Efraim's latest patch, > packages seem to be referring to the replacement for glibc-final. That's good news! > So, do we think this patch is ready to apply? AFAIK, nobody has yet > tried upgrading a GuixSD system with this patch. I won't have access to > my bare-metal GuixSD system for the next few days. I think someone should try reconfiguring their GuixSD system and booting into it before we apply it to master. I might be able to do it tonight, or else I can do it tomorrow. Mark