From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: bug#27759: NTP pool vendor zone Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 22:40:20 +0200 Message-ID: <87bmogma8b.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20170718214256.GA20175@jasmine.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50645) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dXvmM-00040G-9F for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 16:41:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dXvmH-00067r-TP for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 16:41:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:45505) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dXvmH-00067n-QJ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 16:41:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dXvmH-0004Qw-JF for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 16:41:01 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20170718214256.GA20175@jasmine.lan> (Leo Famulari's message of "Tue, 18 Jul 2017 17:42:56 -0400") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Leo Famulari Cc: 27759@debbugs.gnu.org Leo Famulari skribis: > Currently our ntp-service uses the top-level NTP pool servers [0]: > > (define %ntp-servers > ;; Default set of NTP servers. > '("0.pool.ntp.org" > "1.pool.ntp.org" > "2.pool.ntp.org")) > > However, the NTP Pool project requests that operating system vendors > (that's us!) don't use these servers directly [1]: Oops! I had read about this before and then forgot. > They recommend we apply for a vendor zone instead [2]. We would not have > to run our own NTP servers. > > Does anyone know if GNU or the FSF have a vendor zone we could use? > Otherwise, we should apply for one and adjust our ntp-service. Apparently 1.gnu.pool.ntp.org does not exist, so I suppose we can apply for one. I=E2=80=99ll email the GNU maintainer list to let them know and double-chec= k. Thanks, LUdo=E2=80=99.