From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: bug#26006: [Website] Integral update proposal Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2017 19:53:03 +0200 Message-ID: <87bmo3i0zk.fsf@gnu.org> References: <57bc6255-c3a1-61e2-fee4-5b6f523a9885@zoho.com> <87injztuax.fsf@gnu.org> <877f0d65qe.fsf@gnu.org> <877f0cjtul.fsf@gnu.org> <493e9e04-fc8f-2a77-0927-a862f174aa55@zoho.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49760) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dbVwG-000737-7T for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Jul 2017 13:54:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dbVwB-0003uQ-CJ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Jul 2017 13:54:08 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:58884) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dbVwB-0003uM-9s for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Jul 2017 13:54:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dbVwB-0006nK-3g for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Jul 2017 13:54:03 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <493e9e04-fc8f-2a77-0927-a862f174aa55@zoho.com> (sirgazil@zoho.com's message of "Fri, 16 Jun 2017 09:46:31 -0500") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: sirgazil Cc: 26006@debbugs.gnu.org Hi sirgazil, Sorry for the looong delay. I=E2=80=99ve finally incorporated the new web = site in the guix-artwork.git repo along with a couple of fixes: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix/guix-artwork.git/log/?h=3Dwip-webs= ite-update I think it=E2=80=99s mostly ready to go. There are a few things missing fr= om package pages: =E2=80=A2 The gnu icon next to GNU packages; it=E2=80=99d be easy to re-i= ntroduce, but I=E2=80=99m not sure whether/how it could fit well in the page design. =E2=80=A2 The JS build status icons. Likewise, I=E2=80=99m not sure how = to make it look good on package pages. =E2=80=A2 The reproducibility and issue pages, but we=E2=80=99ve disabled= them recently anyway for performance reasons. Thoughts? I guess none of these are blockers, though. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.