From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: bug#32894: Exception in validate-runpath phase
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2018 14:21:46 +0200
Message-ID: <87bm8439yd.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <a1e911c6609a5d0e811a3be41e2fa112@lepiller.eu>
	<877ej0o7ht.fsf@gnu.org>
	<ee726bc8e7295ec7447baa4fcfd4ab16@lepiller.eu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56869)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1g9UZ0-0001aQ-Pq
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Oct 2018 08:23:07 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1g9UYw-0008Ad-Ll
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Oct 2018 08:23:06 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:35694)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1g9UYw-0008AR-97
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Oct 2018 08:23:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1g9UYw-0004nz-4H
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Oct 2018 08:23:02 -0400
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.32894.B32894.153900132218388@debbugs.gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <ee726bc8e7295ec7447baa4fcfd4ab16@lepiller.eu> (Julien Lepiller's
	message of "Wed, 03 Oct 2018 10:14:21 +0200")
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix/>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "bug-Guix" <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Julien Lepiller <julien@lepiller.eu>
Cc: 32894@debbugs.gnu.org

Hello,

Julien Lepiller <julien@lepiller.eu> skribis:

> Le 2018-10-02 14:31, ludo@gnu.org a =C3=A9crit=C2=A0:
>> Hello Julien,
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> Then again, these are =E2=80=9C.debuginfo=E2=80=9D files so perhaps they=
 are the result
>> of home-made ELF stripping (we don=E2=80=99t have this problem with =E2=
=80=9C.debug=E2=80=9D
>> files created with objcopy & co.).
>>
>> I can see two short-term =E2=80=9Csolutions=E2=80=9D:
>>
>>   1. Remove those .debuginfo files prior to the =E2=80=98validate-runpat=
h=E2=80=99
>>      phase.
>>
>>   2. Set #:validate-runpath? #f.
>>
>> Could you check in your build logs how those .debuginfo files are
>> produced?
>>
>> HTH!
>>
>> Ludo=E2=80=99.
>
> As a workaround, I found that passing
> --with-native-debug-symbols=3Dzipped to the configure script allowed
> validate-runpath to complete successfully. This option is documented
> as the prefered value for distributions, so I think it's a good thing
> to have. I creates zipped versions of these .debuginfo files, so
> validate-runpath doesn't look at them.

Hmm OK.  :-)

Is it the files that are zipped, or just .debug sections that are
gzipped?  (Binutils, GDB, etc. support the latter.)

> There is no mention of debuginfo until the install phase in my build
> log, so I don't know how they are built.

OK.

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.