From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id SLhEC2wo81/vUgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 04 Jan 2021 14:38:36 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id kFAYB2wo818sVAAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 04 Jan 2021 14:38:36 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E9C894030E for ; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 14:38:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:52890 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kwR0E-0003h8-1s for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2021 09:38:34 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45342) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kwQxm-0000zQ-DQ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2021 09:36:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:46785) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kwQxm-00029w-66 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2021 09:36:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kwQxm-0007m8-2W for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2021 09:36:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#45559: Cuirass has not successfully evaluated the stagig branch in 3 weeks Resent-From: Mathieu Othacehe Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2021 14:36:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45559 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Leo Famulari Received: via spool by 45559-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B45559.160977095029870 (code B ref 45559); Mon, 04 Jan 2021 14:36:02 +0000 Received: (at 45559) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Jan 2021 14:35:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58331 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kwQxZ-0007li-OV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2021 09:35:49 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:52122) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kwQxX-0007lV-S3 for 45559@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2021 09:35:48 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:35565) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kwQxR-0001zj-R7; Mon, 04 Jan 2021 09:35:42 -0500 Received: from 2a01cb000492e900850cfb5459e5908f.ipv6.abo.wanadoo.fr ([2a01:cb00:492:e900:850c:fb54:59e5:908f]:55276 helo=cervin) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kwQxD-0005nO-DH; Mon, 04 Jan 2021 09:35:36 -0500 From: Mathieu Othacehe In-Reply-To: (Leo Famulari's message of "Mon, 4 Jan 2021 09:08:21 -0500") References: <87lfd9hxf7.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2021 15:35:25 +0100 Message-ID: <87ble4ixci.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 45559@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.83 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 8E9C894030E X-Spam-Score: -2.83 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: HwoK1DuOCgQ0 Hey Leo, > Is there any documentation on how to reproduce the problems caused by > this? Or any advice on debugging? > > `guix pull` and `make` work okay. I'm currently running: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- (use-modules (gnu ci) (guix)) (hydra-jobs (open-connection) '()) --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- which is replication the evaluation process. Thanks, Mathieu