From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id CHKNNB21wGFadQAAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 17:53:49 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id EOE4MB21wGFWGgAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 16:53:49 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D1BD10EC8 for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 17:53:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:45182 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mzLv2-0000m5-Oi for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 11:53:48 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:53480) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mzKc3-0006hw-WF for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 10:30:08 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:39606) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mzKby-0003TO-OT for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 10:30:05 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mzKby-0003Su-J3 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 10:30:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#52520: Multicast is off by default Resent-From: Maxim Cournoyer Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2021 15:30:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 52520 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Mathieu Othacehe Received: via spool by 52520-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B52520.164001418113261 (code B ref 52520); Mon, 20 Dec 2021 15:30:02 +0000 Received: (at 52520) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Dec 2021 15:29:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51152 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mzKbd-0003Ro-Fk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 10:29:41 -0500 Received: from mail-qk1-f174.google.com ([209.85.222.174]:44948) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mzKbb-0003RZ-Gy for 52520@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 10:29:40 -0500 Received: by mail-qk1-f174.google.com with SMTP id 132so9646054qkj.11 for <52520@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 07:29:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=zk2/uhpYMayDOd+F1o4WnfG5A86jXhI5vOm2fBlenqk=; b=S0q+ftMvPCNBZlK/+FcwQSKFEbeP46o816QMU8Cbs+XY4SezL3WJgf7eNteYFJCF5s QeFe0a3mGmrphVkUyvD6BLKEuG5Sm2lfe2RG/hQHyXXgq7jTOFGvUAKnmEYmGANpHEhk ApgRIem0Sx16G9B+5m54bGXVra8K5xLLX+YdsbMWNhBRXVs+qrx+gp6JDNoq+F9Sr8V0 BLox/ncUPTLbvh3XC7rvggJrQZvtCEBudarrIWefEQi2oKupv7Hv9zug7V8IYwLz1WX2 0SMJSc2v7B32ZdAOgGZmQjoNCfyLLimIssaqZ1P3oyFpuAAobG+zB0VZ22TBh0pH2pHq fZqQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=zk2/uhpYMayDOd+F1o4WnfG5A86jXhI5vOm2fBlenqk=; b=nLkHGOzADzDhS1i798xVrzdiHWb7LLvzJLPNP5H4VPPIStETHyVwv5imbv0MBt1TmO T78umNG7zC3HbS7hLmnsy/ow+5Z1eTJI4KQ6mE7XdG8wHRhYa5lCRxcl3Swpu0VaFMzT zeuG8+FC9C4OvKcr7ZGVLy6Vlq9JwSkpfx2Xl5TZfVZSnbn6JKlJ2cPPo24HajYC8sYZ HN9tB8uN+nD3Kri5HewSElYk4x8ZtvIZrPkba0SzdlMN/4lyJmX61rU5vdcpcLJ/DT0R WZGKKPvPN04nci/g6K3nF8OBJlwIkVuEB8I9SkO53OUf+9jJqlR7Y3vUD/M6sQiHRdpf Isiw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531vx/WsRH3WvCD9Cq6p3+ImbSJXLBIrM1iaRUKmOZDW8xfKmTNl CwbLYjBSIGKJtedADDz67oMerlvVaLjepQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwE7uB7AX0Y2PbYhHkrI3StvA79K7FNzsGC5z0bSlSOJ5oVLcDKNVMzmaKBgqKNHXlVMidadQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:1585:: with SMTP id d5mr9802698qkk.96.1640014172668; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 07:29:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from hurd (dsl-10-141-47.b2b2c.ca. [72.10.141.47]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x16sm11677588qko.15.2021.12.20.07.29.31 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 20 Dec 2021 07:29:32 -0800 (PST) From: Maxim Cournoyer References: <8735mt64pl.fsf@gnu.org> <87czlvqn3b.fsf@gnu.org> <87sfuovomi.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2021 10:29:30 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87sfuovomi.fsf@gnu.org> (Mathieu Othacehe's message of "Sun, 19 Dec 2021 12:08:05 +0100") Message-ID: <87bl1b2t2d.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 52520@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1640019229; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=zk2/uhpYMayDOd+F1o4WnfG5A86jXhI5vOm2fBlenqk=; b=SFs2UogSmOV9dZTBPah/y4/8RR8yErxtglGrRGtYEpxrgnxh6SXpbkmqf5JqAkQ8WtfYZa vpd7FRhPfGgzGw+jbE1MKOTqWLDjdq6smK9MDjHKVj1jQKxkK+/9KeE70IsSNRxwrk5UAD 5/yrKHT07Tzj48gI6QMXVeOxu/JB9mzVsP4yQ2pID9zPZpnnEuFQ2kxxvQMGRGKU93SFpV YeuEjs4wZHYFI4ZdDYPYGnGkKXQ6HvRINBL1obqTkPUi/awXoSdMODch+UvOm4m/GTKGvf ZwciUwr0EMiLMBzxS7zFJroLvNaCH2gap2M5T+Mf0ZW3vr9Q2MwECyoA8aeHyg== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1640019229; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=LTNhWdPS45YcFJURaJDxt9adugSins0Z9tMeSC0qk0E5C/BIqVNPbmINAh4oz8Fv7Pe+cP tkkY9MeqvRtcpFdghQRLp/oTHz/6vPvSAA2VNlMi32T02Bl/LGqmvBTy4xWNLgWXHoQ8d6 ATWfqI6bEo40FnQ/YrI0Vos28u+3k/ZtHEPEokE4j7B1Qr0Wi1JNuxUyLTczJ6RekBtxRQ fCfsffZhUnWNaPXOewCyyByaiBclMmwF2uo61AhE0Bw3Ut5nLpnDdd3ZH5Y1X8FSHMtKqD URegaYXxk8SN6KccPWQguYf+lJQdyQuWcCOepLCL+kUvPbUMxYY3twkzFHebzA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=S0q+ftMv; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -0.72 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=S0q+ftMv; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 9D1BD10EC8 X-Spam-Score: -0.72 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: VzRppz+3Bxc6 Hello, Mathieu Othacehe writes: > Hey, > >> Is it #:multicast-on or #:allmulticast-on ? > > The "ip link set multicast ..." command corresponds to the the > IFF_MULTICAST flag hence to the #:multicast-on parameter. > >> Anyhow, I suggest adding a =E2=80=98multicast?=E2=80=99 field to , with >> #t as its default value, and honoring this. > > I'm not sure is the right place for this flag. If > there are two records in the same list, one for ipv4 > and one for ipv6 it means that we need to repeat this flag twice. > > Same for the MTU, having different MTU for ipv4 and ipv6 addresses > doesn't have any meaning. The MTU and multicast properties belong to the > device itself. > > I think we should introduce a record that would gather > the properties that can be passed to the "link-set" method of > Guile-Netlink. The record would point to a unique > . We would remove the device field from > . > > Then each service would provision (concat > 'networking- (network-device-name device)) or something like that, to fix > https://issues.guix.gnu.org/52511 as well. > > How does that sounds? Seems to have it on the network device would be less surprising, indeed :-). It makes sense to me. Thank you, Maxim