From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms8.migadu.com with LMTPS id iPe0L7A9uGUwNwAA62LTzQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 01:07:12 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1.migadu.com with LMTPS id iPe0L7A9uGUwNwAA62LTzQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 01:07:12 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=ZEPFTDy1; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1706573232; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=tRuzzIP0UveXZE5xk9F0u4fV0/uFvmONaDBI/YSjgbE7AZJhOSQRPS+xXHzj3wRdrxHqm8 MmnAy3FwUQkYjBjJaoSNXkDTPsLFUmFYB7gAmd1ijCrm9MfUJsiCv3UrIIYLgu0Iu/Ic5L lsLdP0DumQYm8hWigLWx1kxqs7NhBK84xhIMX7Py2b+9chcEcrPJXi0hpZSOI38z2/4FpK keAW/i4CbLinYYNouKiFHi4KISKuYQXZF+Y5W9t5mvfDsSfyEvn4LpcPUyFXOFCYNe0Dy8 UD6K8ZqWwB0yLZ63N2Mf2UzWhFeRr9lUz11aAzFAd6L766cEqoO7pX2CUr2E/g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=ZEPFTDy1; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1706573232; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe: list-post:dkim-signature; bh=XSHWwlT4nlJ3BHvJcxy41qKtYugE2ecVVP3wD8Oc/Qo=; b=mJNQFoF1orYyu+taIIVmREprR6YFxAgICK41wow63TYyJplU2KL1LofxXLXxt9oWATCeJu tne3tGfWVp4qKjaVw2y8Da9wWOZeeYlKuLaA7aEM9a+yl/dFsimWSPZM1HalJhz1PqXbuP QiXvkU3n3jIn+O9vpQZAccgxUVxuJxqiA7qr+BRNsHZPZbJwmqFgirq2aXxMSiJVYPI0JF pSlXAAtHFecx4GlWG2WCf6TDcPctmqZBfAf0o4hskpZOA8+Qzoa2yi7aNrrIcExeJUmte6 EUU239D3jBfSz29b5uV9v0HdLu594m/Wk4fpnYn2Ar5PzDF3KX/N8kMQSMQPfQ== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1DD4D75B for ; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 01:07:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rUbeR-0007Qm-NZ; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 19:06:55 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rUbeQ-0007PL-6f for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 19:06:54 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rUbeP-00022x-UE for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 19:06:53 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rUbeY-0004uY-AD for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 19:07:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#68811: build hash inconsistency Resent-From: Zacchaeus Scheffer Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 00:07:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 68811 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 68811@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.170657319418843 (code B ref -1); Tue, 30 Jan 2024 00:07:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Jan 2024 00:06:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33802 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rUbe5-0004tq-J8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 19:06:33 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:33690) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rUbe2-0004tY-PH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 19:06:31 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rUbdi-0006u8-Or for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 19:06:11 -0500 Received: from mail-oo1-xc2d.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::c2d]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rUbdf-0001xi-N0 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 19:06:09 -0500 Received: by mail-oo1-xc2d.google.com with SMTP id 006d021491bc7-5955a4a9b23so1733994eaf.1 for ; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 16:06:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1706573164; x=1707177964; darn=gnu.org; h=mime-version:message-id:date:subject:to:from:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=XSHWwlT4nlJ3BHvJcxy41qKtYugE2ecVVP3wD8Oc/Qo=; b=ZEPFTDy1so/iNy+gKx6tAUntOVvWUFrfFM1bOTOPtesHRQfJGu4+GKhwq+bZ95EG5l akJxWSY3m5mvXu1qKlQiKQpHs8NLmvWnJdEfQN4lgtG1KLUX31JFA3n7bBe6OjbKxW0K T/rIfTPE1ImJSVRa1yJUW3bOvqlN6BtrUwXVRkTvYM2ox9ZlLQisaOxTctu2Nj6E/ups +gNEC9SzChnyVUWrHt4UbTe+cyMtHSK1m7rrVz24/izlLIWiMf3LBERxpxW14hEe/SXc XKataRHaBe8mmULtAbexAG6eLM2URVu7D38Uozu4/fGzDd2KZ0RPzd1ZMWCOZYu30cjU VzJQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1706573164; x=1707177964; h=mime-version:message-id:date:subject:to:from:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=XSHWwlT4nlJ3BHvJcxy41qKtYugE2ecVVP3wD8Oc/Qo=; b=LLQRgCwZv2Tu3h1+jvu0c9hze6EXYzW3LPoDxDbiwyMvpSkoYd5Vba6obzdZqUfhj5 kRkJjZDV+DXQsOudLOVVcwZnsCfOh3n7XIngIgWDddf+zL5WLvjAE42qDV3yxxbGn241 Uf44ZamYK3BiJ4zyG2nzpQQcJF5odMUzO5eSjYdXcMIQ/tLIiBb9QtWS7a59MiLrdGw8 4e98z/2V443bdjOFUm2L479Q/28Z5oxO82KOFooli+JzSBnHOXsowZmAayJa/xdRIXW3 oj2sg1HciqijODp1f01LNb5ti+H10kWTl+7C3/4U4Is8WARL+t7A9tlaq5G4ac9gOZZs mpQg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwJEYUKHY1+zRDajUWbStjdoD5rALmyyz9XUzm32FAV7Z7PZjtH WV+yE+WUG0R61j9zqBnCwLveGh4RqgY5HnOnVvioMMKFCMR5BwRv/AuUqgiQwq4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGUaRfgp5SWVyka8g2RYUx2JTeLtt6lvWb/L6pdaPTSZ756Up+WMkux1lcMeiMyyt9jO00MqQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6358:6f0e:b0:176:c391:3899 with SMTP id r14-20020a0563586f0e00b00176c3913899mr5718825rwn.11.1706573164278; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 16:06:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from pureos ([192.147.44.15]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id lp17-20020a056a003d5100b006ddd182bf1csm6456798pfb.46.2024.01.29.16.06.03 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 29 Jan 2024 16:06:03 -0800 (PST) From: Zacchaeus Scheffer Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 16:06:01 -0800 Message-ID: <87bk938z2u.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::c2d; envelope-from=zaccysc@gmail.com; helo=mail-oo1-xc2d.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Scanner: mx10.migadu.com X-Spam-Score: -5.56 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: A1DD4D75B X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -5.56 X-TUID: DYFnZfwethpg Hi all, tl;dr I run the following command on two aarch64-linux machines and get two different hashes for the 'qutebrowser' package: guix time-machine --commit=deeb7d1f53d7ddfa977b3eadd760312bbd0a2509 -- build qutebrowser --dry-run Both machines use only the main guix repository, and guix describe gives the same output (except generation number and date, which is fine). Coming from aarch64, building is incredibly expensive. If the build hash doesn't match, then (I believe) there is no hope that my machine will find the packages on a substitute server. To get around this issue, I built my guix home once, guix copy'd the store items, and manually added a symlink in /var/guix/profiles/per-user/USER/guix-home-N-link to point to the foreign guix home build. I couldn't find this issue elsewhere in the issues, but my "hashes don't match" problem is pretty vague. Is this an expected problem? Is this a novel problem? Am I misunderstanding guix time-machine (which seems like it should produce an identical store item)? -Zacchae