From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ng0 Subject: bug#25142: openssl lacks lib/libssl.a Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2016 10:49:29 +0000 Message-ID: <87a8c5wf5y.fsf@wasp.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> References: <8737hy85fq.fsf@wasp.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87lgvpxzpm.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87eg1hwg8u.fsf@wasp.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87d1h1xu4s.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58429) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cFIlg-00086k-D5 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2016 05:51:09 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cFIla-00058T-Tp for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2016 05:51:08 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:48118) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cFIla-00058P-Qo for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2016 05:51:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cFIla-0002p1-Ds for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2016 05:51:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87d1h1xu4s.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Marius Bakke Cc: 25142@debbugs.gnu.org Marius Bakke writes: > ng0 writes: > >> Marius Bakke writes: >> >>> ng0 writes: >>> >>>> In commit 0c69a17efdba0c7c3da0f25800a3c3233200e47b I found out >>>> that our openssl lacks lib/libssl.a ... this should be fixed >>>> somehow with the next update of the openssl package. >>> >>> Did you try the "static" output of OpenSSL? >> >> No, I did not know it existed. If this would be in out:static, >> why is this file in libressl normal output? > > I think the main reason static libraries are often in separate outputs > is because of bandwidth concerns, since they are often much larger than > their dynamic counterparts (.so). And the closure size can be smaller, > since they don't contain external references. > > LibreSSL probably haven't seen enough use for it to be a concern. Feel > free to submit a patch! :-) Oh, so this is a bug and not intentional. Okay, I'll submit a patch this month. -- ♥Ⓐ ng0 | ng0.chaosnet.org