From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: bug#36931: [swh-devel] bug#36931: guile-bash repository no longer exists? Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 17:27:05 +0200 Message-ID: <87a7bupr1y.fsf__12041.1454745167$1566920727$gmane$org@inria.fr> References: <05b9dc182cdcbe72ddea77191681258380a672a4.camel@gmail.com> <87ftmfznhs.fsf@elephly.net> <20190805223907.5ead2297@alma-ubu> <87imqn4zfq.fsf@gnu.org> <20190826142435.beivr3d7ydo2rxmb@werner.olasd.eu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51921) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i2dOD-00080K-Vt for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 11:28:10 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i2dO8-0002N3-JH for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 11:28:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:40517) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i2dO6-0002Li-Cn for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 11:28:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i2dO6-0003vt-7b for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 11:28:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20190826142435.beivr3d7ydo2rxmb@werner.olasd.eu> (Nicolas Dandrimont's message of "Mon, 26 Aug 2019 16:24:35 +0200") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Nicolas Dandrimont Cc: swh-devel@inria.fr, 36931@debbugs.gnu.org, Jesse Gibbons Hello, Nicolas Dandrimont skribis: > We've recently moved the Software Heritage Vault to different infrastruct= ure. > In doing so, the existing bundles were scrapped; however, the old cache e= ntries > in the database hadn't been invalidated. Oh I see. > I've now made sure that pre-migration cache entries have been invalidated= . I've > also scheduled cooking of objects that had been accessed recently, includ= ing > the one you've referenced, and they should now be available for download = (or > at least trickling in). It=E2=80=99s much nicer now. I guess we have a good test case. :-) Thanks for explaining! Ludo=E2=80=99.