From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: bug#37128: guix system reconfigure stops output after "Evaluating user expression..." Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 14:41:51 +0200 Message-ID: <87a7bsi1o0.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87mug2fypu.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87a7btf2cs.fsf@gnu.org> <87ef14toyu.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44424) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i3JlX-0006LW-Om for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 08:43:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i3JlW-0004CP-Q4 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 08:43:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42922) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i3JlW-0004CD-Ej for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 08:43:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i3JlW-0004jB-Aj for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 08:43:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87ef14toyu.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> (Pierre Neidhardt's message of "Thu, 29 Aug 2019 09:23:05 +0200") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Pierre Neidhardt Cc: 37128@debbugs.gnu.org Pierre Neidhardt skribis: > This is the last message in /var/log/messages: > > Aug 29 09:13:40 localhost shepherd[1]: Evaluating user expression (let* (= (services (map primitive-load (?))) # ?) ?).=20 > >> Did >> /var/log/messages or the console show anything? > > What console? /dev/console, so tty1, typically. >> I suppose you=E2=80=99d have to try again the experiment. Presumably th= ere=E2=80=99s >> some fsck-like process or something taking time or waiting for input. > > Note that everything works alright. But I'm worried that this would > fail on a new installation where the bootloader is missing :( Where the bootloader is missing? The bootloader cannot be missing or the thing is not installed. :-) Ludo=E2=80=99.