From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id QN1VMnthHGFIOAAAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 03:25:15 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id qFMSLnthHGEHBAAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 01:25:15 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BCD2E13C3B for ; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 03:25:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:34248 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mGAKM-0008Eh-Ni for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 21:25:10 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54468) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mGAKE-0008CH-P9 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 21:25:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42911) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mGAKE-0000in-IU for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 21:25:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mGAKD-0002YW-Tb for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 21:25:01 -0400 Subject: bug#25952: offloading: empty machines file leads to error Resent-From: Maxim Cournoyer Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2021 01:25:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 25952 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo To: zimoun Mail-Followup-To: 25952@debbugs.gnu.org, maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com, contact.ng0@cryptolab.net Received: via spool by 25952-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D25952.16292499019810 (code D ref 25952); Wed, 18 Aug 2021 01:25:01 +0000 Received: (at 25952-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Aug 2021 01:25:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54457 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mGAK9-0002Y5-Cd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 21:25:01 -0400 Received: from mail-qv1-f54.google.com ([209.85.219.54]:43581) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mGAK3-0002Xp-Rv for 25952-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 21:24:55 -0400 Received: by mail-qv1-f54.google.com with SMTP id db14so828127qvb.10 for <25952-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 18:24:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8x9wcngDMgPd+wbT+QEcCURuD3gIJXiinC8CBV2W9qQ=; b=Kidq/jg+619uUq4zMqBE6VKAtTsNk3aG+fdStXtKFi/AiMfOMdO2v2vdOrr2FQy7Vf dImeNSSZO9yAKDvPE+No1+aywtf+mxI4pzZ8y8Bo+yZcKxj72Xwc+i+PDMaGgMKfoLeL wYdiCmTZpSGC50U9ryPgn/cEMciH+L3e0s7PjkxRSrmrS3I4knJYFsGNhS2MvXOdOwep vh0AVeOjJ7rtGPMeP0iTySDEnzNNN9InrwnJqawqA7vxSZyGa8z3wPGG5eTm8wFg3YR/ Y6XUhs+OIpdnmGnIEVNdVItIFvW7p2WWl6wTUZUbyAPvXK2drua/Zhdg6XFMjXKJEav6 OYGQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8x9wcngDMgPd+wbT+QEcCURuD3gIJXiinC8CBV2W9qQ=; b=WhDlHHx6hAzryulGgvJlBOd7r3+qtpsCdpaYhkDYVE9vTSECABUAZFsNhHuEqOOBit QXbFPdyRXXyTtfMxK1yVbnb4+mww2gnGmEDXAlZnj2rp1N8WCHanlpRoyBs/VMCrmRXS B3zNhN9/SV7sotJE9y7XSusVPeNso3KDXYYPSk0o5CLJBYH0tV0hWHztL4JIZDRg/7wZ cezHStWuZwmpyHjbV8jGAXuDyiAbL0IShnAOu9fHaJb4T/zuDDJHE47BO8MCsD/qkp22 NnEJ6NrTJ9ZVB10ZJEGtgjRDpwO/aqsHHm0bqm4L1WABuG1SSFIaVd9lekNuRqnTiJlP O+tA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531yHkV8p6YJDfF609qhv/fRFSrJH+LMjEqkZUtWfU6q8/95ciMU G5CJF88imci2oe66ctdd0XXFr3f+7HM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJypBX0TXLFeZxzEDc3+XyV+BjHZF92AnJvJWYNnCy1Ow+PeCK1/V3waYCnP+2Iz0dq6l7oarQ== X-Received: by 2002:a0c:f6cf:: with SMTP id d15mr6579472qvo.50.1629249886420; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 18:24:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hurd (dsl-236-123-187.b2b2c.ca. [207.236.123.187]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y11sm1919500qtx.13.2021.08.17.18.24.43 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 17 Aug 2021 18:24:44 -0700 (PDT) From: Maxim Cournoyer References: <20170303165648.wg5nypcizxr2n6t5@abyayala> <87tv03ycvo.fsf@nckx> <86bl76pr9p.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2021 21:24:43 -0400 In-Reply-To: <86bl76pr9p.fsf@gmail.com> (zimoun's message of "Tue, 13 Jul 2021 10:11:30 +0200") Message-ID: <87a6lfy278.fsf_-_@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 25952-done@debbugs.gnu.org, contact.ng0@cryptolab.net Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1629249915; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-to: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=8x9wcngDMgPd+wbT+QEcCURuD3gIJXiinC8CBV2W9qQ=; b=Fit29/roPUB7XgKTtIQ4i8nc/kK/NwMfFEZm8ZEeORw7CbqM+hwcqZOsi0VbThqxzFNBZe hZvu8QAsMZ0suLKcrsimvhhgGycTekp8PhdZ7Xl7htZm7euaoEO9TjngLuf2vsjTdEaTeT yXYWyjiX7/sF4XGIui+ygmxM+AVLTEVhT8W8328twbfSmvCTc5FK3jl+BDKSVTI3s04zgR FslFiD7CMXQ+jYK+HwMjLNee7t6Gx42S7bW+kqotpBB8nu/mmo00doTvLxOa6/LZl2rRK1 sSHUbOmQ72j1SQptkAbRuiGSUnHpQLGAoAR4dK70cjhnt5MTldIjo9e1LvR/nQ== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1629249915; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=R5Yv283kgPZ5egNTg35ADBiadQ/HTUKIwsvLLGWZJkKnroI1l05gzhVEHpPmwAwuG+///4 JxI1f7Zd7M6NmQeIZXNj6ER3f3c23UWTsQBZf4H3K35muAq86YtP1dw1aziI5ThgmtOHL0 2d2FbTk/+HzuJDIYQRhTbtKitpIpS9A7i+4+viaVvX6FLj/FktjTdHjcW18zEvRBHzt02V qbYmjLv17PkKnDP5AmAe2Jps+6qtquGTdOnA+Q75Q77lTbQAe19LdsQND7+PvmwBZg4hoi cm25GWtw2nRPnqzG0xBQTsd/5O1E5t2t8YzpumOplEWpLQkAB9CyOXbsxngltQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b="Kidq/jg+"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.32 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b="Kidq/jg+"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: BCD2E13C3B X-Spam-Score: -1.32 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: Ab9ydHwtCs4a Hi Simon, zimoun writes: > Hi Tobias, > > On Mon, 25 May 2020 at 22:32, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote: >> zimoun =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A >>> This bug [1] had not been commented since the last 3 years and it has >>> been asked more info 3 weeks ago. >> >> The issue is that files such as /etc/guix/machines.scm (but this applies >> equally to /etc/guix/acl & so on) are expected to evaluate to a sexp. >> >> An empty file does not a valid sexp make, so Guix throws an prickly back= trace >> @ your face & dies. This is unlike most other configuration formats whe= re an >> empty file or one consisting entirely of comments is a no-op. >> >> We should decide whether =E2=80=98=E2=80=99 is a valid sexp (oh dear, ph= ilosophy) or throw >> something softer at people. >> >>> Therefore, I am closing. Feel free to reopen if I misunderstand someth= ing. >> >> I think this bug should remain open until it's decided. What you? > > This bug [1] had been initially opened on March, 3rd 2017 then commented > for the first time [2] on May, 3rd 2020 and closed [3] on May, 25th > 2020. Then reopen the same day [4] with this =E2=80=9Cphilosophical=E2= =80=9D question > about: is empty =E2=80=99=E2=80=99 a valid sexp? On May, 26th 2020 [5], = I provided more > examples. > >>>From my understanding, =C2=ABthrow something softer=C2=BB should be done = on the > Guile side, as suggested by [6] on September, 13rd 2020. > > Personally, I do not see what could be the next action [7]? Therefore, > if no more explanations about what the issue really is and what be the > plan to fix it, I will close it. WDYT? What happens: # mv /etc/guix/machines.scm{,.bak} $ guix build hello --no-substitutes -> Download sources and builds locally. OK! # touch /etc/guix/machines.scm $ guix build hello --no-substitutes -> Builds locally. OK! Seems the original issue has been resolved since. Closing. Maxim