From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: bug#22049: libreoffice compile error
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2016 14:36:24 +0100
Message-ID: <878u22pbfr.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <21c1059e083d3df68b981cb1a83b3a7c@openmailbox.org>
	<877fl0lugc.fsf@gnu.org>
	<931b1698a0a6d10913db88e944622dc4@openmailbox.org>
	<20151130195654.GA32198@jasmine> <87h9gsvhep.fsf@gnu.org>
	<20160229083540.GA18295@jasmine> <20160229083723.GA18766@jasmine>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58184)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1aakU5-0004iw-9N
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Mar 2016 08:37:11 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1aakU2-0004Kq-3r
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Mar 2016 08:37:05 -0500
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:57700)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1aakU2-0004Km-0t
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Mar 2016 08:37:02 -0500
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1aakU1-0007bC-Sn
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Mar 2016 08:37:01 -0500
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.22049.B22049.145683939929181@debbugs.gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <20160229083723.GA18766@jasmine> (Leo Famulari's message of "Mon,
	29 Feb 2016 03:37:23 -0500")
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
Cc: rennes@openmailbox.org, 22049@debbugs.gnu.org

Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> skribis:

> From bf1f2a1c3621ba93ec99711ec78a79663acb6e82 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> Message-Id: <bf1f2a1c3621ba93ec99711ec78a79663acb6e82.1456734966.git.leo@=
famulari.name>
> From: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
> Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 02:23:43 -0500
> Subject: [PATCH 1/1] gnu: ilmbase: Add patches to fix build on i686.
>
> Fixes <http://bugs.gnu.org/22049>.
>
> * gnu/packages/patches/ilmbase-testBox.patch,
> gnu/packages/patches/ilmbase-testBoxAlgo.patch: New files.
> * gnu-system.am (dist_patch_DATA): Add them.
> * gnu/packages/graphics.scm (ilmbase)[native-inputs]: Add patch/testBox
> and patch/testBoxAlgo.
> [arguments]: Add 'patch-for-i686' phase.

Cool!

I think it=E2=80=99d be reasonable to squash both patches in one file, and =
to
apply it unconditionally.  WDYT?

So I gather upgrading to IlmBase 2.0.1 is not an option?

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.