From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: bug#33137: [Wishlist] recursive guix lint Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2018 23:29:28 +0100 Message-ID: <878t2h66yf.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20181024123915.GB1297@macbook41> <875zxqup8r.fsf@gnu.org> <20181027203013.GF1297@macbook41> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43061) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gGtZM-0004oM-1H for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2018 18:30:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gGtZK-0002hA-TX for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2018 18:30:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:45157) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gGtZK-0002gW-LT for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2018 18:30:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gGtZK-0000VN-H4 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2018 18:30:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20181027203013.GF1297@macbook41> (Efraim Flashner's message of "Sat, 27 Oct 2018 23:30:13 +0300") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Efraim Flashner Cc: 33137@debbugs.gnu.org Efraim Flashner skribis: > On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 03:31:32PM +0200, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >> Hello, >>=20 >> Efraim Flashner skribis: >>=20 >> > We have the linter check for CVEs and updates to packages in a list, b= ut >> > what about those packages they depend on? It would be great to be able >> > to 'guix lint --recursive foo' and get foo and also all the packages in >> > the different types of inputs. >>=20 >> On the question of CVEs, see also >> . >>=20 >> Do you think --recursive would be useful for other types of linters? >>=20 >> Thanks, >> Ludo=E2=80=99. > > Checking for new versions would definately be good. But that=E2=80=99s what =E2=80=98guix refresh=E2=80=99 does, right? > It seems to me that checking everything would make for better code > overall, but the behavior I would expect is that it would check all > the linters specified in the command. If you run =E2=80=98guix lint=E2=80=99 without any arguments, all the packa= ges are checked. Is this what you meant? Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.