From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mathieu Othacehe Subject: bug#36882: Qemu 4.2.0 build for x86_64-linux fails Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2020 08:39:35 +0100 Message-ID: <878skh3n0o.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87k14gnqng.fsf@gmail.com> <87mu9b3crd.fsf@gnu.org> <87a75a5taw.fsf@gmail.com> <87o8tptu7u.fsf@gnu.org> <87ftf0nx7n.fsf@gmail.com> <87tv3gm59r.fsf@gnu.org> <875zfuag6v.fsf@gmail.com> <874kveafns.fsf@gmail.com> <874kv6ju1c.fsf@devup.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:32881) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j929r-0002UY-EU for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2020 02:40:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j929q-0000nn-Gh for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2020 02:40:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:60917) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j929q-0000ne-Dk for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2020 02:40:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j929q-0002ii-9i for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2020 02:40:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-reply-to: <874kv6ju1c.fsf@devup.no> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Marius Bakke Cc: 36882@debbugs.gnu.org Hey Marius, > Did you get anywhere with this? As Ludovic mentioned, it might make > sense to work around it in gnu-build-system too if patching GCC turns > out to be difficult. Yup, turned out patching GCC was too difficult. I'm experimenting a filter over inputs passed to set-path-environment-variable in set-paths. I hope to send this hack to review later this week. Thanks, Mathieu