From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: bug#39926: Regression introduced by Shepherd 0.7.0 ('make check-system TESTS=btrfs-root-os' fails) Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2020 22:36:50 +0100 Message-ID: <878skbetjh.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87wo7yswwy.fsf@gmail.com> <87blpa7m3j.fsf@gnu.org> <87a74skcb1.fsf@gmail.com> <87d09ojt6z.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55862) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jAh83-0007td-0V for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Mar 2020 16:37:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jAh82-0006m1-0O for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Mar 2020 16:37:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:41718) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jAh81-0006lt-T7 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Mar 2020 16:37:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jAh81-0001lG-QJ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Mar 2020 16:37:01 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87d09ojt6z.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Sat, 07 Mar 2020 12:33:08 +0100") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Maxim Cournoyer Cc: 39926@debbugs.gnu.org Hi again! Ludovic Court=C3=A8s skribis: > The broken udev rule is =E2=80=9864-btrfs.rules=E2=80=99 in eudev: > > # reconsider pending devices in case when multidevice volume awaits > ENV{ID_BTRFS_READY}=3D=3D"1", RUN+=3D"${exec_prefix}/bin/udevadm trigger = -s block -p ID_BTRFS_READY=3D0" > > =E2=80=A6 where =E2=80=9C${exec_prefix}=E2=80=9D is expanded from =E2=80= =9C@bindir@=E2=80=9D, a classical > issue that we should report upstream. :-) > > In the meantime, the following patch should solve the problem. I=E2=80= =99m > running the test now, and if it passes and you=E2=80=99re fine with it, I= =E2=80=99ll > commit it. I pushed the patch as 24a4a635fd76a91463c75cfe615929ec482cc2f6. It doesn=E2=80=99t solve the =E2=80=9Cbtrfs-root-os=E2=80=9D bug though. := -/ I noticed that it=E2=80=99s the installation.drv that fails, not the basic.= drv, which is why we see =E2=80=9Cgnu=E2=80=9D as the host name. The weird thin= g is that it fails after =E2=80=98reboot=E2=80=99, so I=E2=80=99m not sure what that mea= ns. To be continued=E2=80=A6 Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.