From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mp2.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	by ms8.migadu.com with LMTPS
	id ONXkJgcRwmV7DQAAe85BDQ:P1
	(envelope-from <bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>)
	for <larch@yhetil.org>; Tue, 06 Feb 2024 11:59:19 +0100
Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	by mp2.migadu.com with LMTPS
	id ONXkJgcRwmV7DQAAe85BDQ
	(envelope-from <bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>)
	for <larch@yhetil.org>; Tue, 06 Feb 2024 11:59:19 +0100
X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org
Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com;
	dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=jpoiret.xyz header.s=dkim header.b=ohVqTtU2;
	dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org;
	spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"
ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1707217159; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none;
	b=tdqjQDgnLd8RUea57wlxuLUSJMYEGrvv0pWhwt7JvFOChVTLQle9y/V6ED/v0qQhSAxR21
	UEIEDt3t6DIxQKSQFNN8S+f0QTgo7k2odfjtEWpRAn6ljYtBTwXGEJ78AmkBRFybGLYbZF
	IHwUziMsvgWKVqlW+yi+mzUO7bHT9w4EiNjWTScc3rZSo6G2OkHlvg/1Ezoddq12KrABED
	rNE5jRYLk0xwu3aYJgI3uz9BY5qn6bm+YwTUlaSY7J6Z4nkKiZ6Zhr1e9zOfjrKETSQ8U5
	2ahTS7Y70As+fcAZU/AMhh8EyHNnFqeaOPgmdd8EwRJm8wndjO/QIcH9QeRGOg==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1;
	aspmx1.migadu.com;
	dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=jpoiret.xyz header.s=dkim header.b=ohVqTtU2;
	dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org;
	spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org;
	s=key1; t=1707217159;
	h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:
	 message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:
	 content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender:
	 resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:
	 list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:
	 dkim-signature; bh=xy3cv9DEJPr9036laIDLEjDT2CxSc9rLJYy8poE04jo=;
	b=dgDjqeJTYxEpLY8JttvkZ7zB9AfXO0TYnxrKt1dMbyu912Wz5D6PSIR/01A1WIVVIjPB4K
	x/HhKhFZymQjZHTvcxT6mmv9x2AAp1uyLrZ6N24MJr1ao3MWe7nojMo4BXZDa3W+pFaf+k
	RG0x15W65ecWTpqBZY6KhjayVS5hlUtsbauJImEX3oVUkrIP3Vsbg0mjJQVn6GBd4Ex5M5
	XVEoL8e1zSdbV0eVJlGCKTXBl2UT/DgpdsQ28FH35EQPXjFEd5XHJ903+rvd84MYEMopSj
	BQiax+L+DdbXUT1bSBeif2Pq0nbPkq+tHW9hwo5BGOWeao3a/0rE5+zIx7q92g==
Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42AC379165
	for <larch@yhetil.org>; Tue,  6 Feb 2024 11:59:19 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org>)
	id 1rXJAB-0007eI-Uj; Tue, 06 Feb 2024 05:58:51 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10])
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1rXJAA-0007dt-1b
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Feb 2024 05:58:50 -0500
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1rXJA9-0007eV-OI
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Feb 2024 05:58:49 -0500
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1rXJAM-0000gj-H2
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Feb 2024 05:59:02 -0500
X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org
Subject: bug#43049: guix installation why internet connection required?
Resent-From: Josselin Poiret <dev@jpoiret.xyz>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org
Resent-Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2024 10:59:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.43049.B43049.17072171352632@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 43049
X-GNU-PR-Package: guix
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: Giovanni Biscuolo <g@xelera.eu>, 43049@debbugs.gnu.org,
 Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com>, vvt@mail-on.us
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org
Received: via spool by 43049-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B43049.17072171352632
 (code B ref 43049); Tue, 06 Feb 2024 10:59:02 +0000
Received: (at 43049) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Feb 2024 10:58:55 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53280 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1rXJAF-0000gN-1c
 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 06 Feb 2024 05:58:55 -0500
Received: from jpoiret.xyz ([206.189.101.64]:40530)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <dev@jpoiret.xyz>) id 1rXJAC-0000gF-HK
 for 43049@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 06 Feb 2024 05:58:53 -0500
Received: from authenticated-user (jpoiret.xyz [206.189.101.64])
 by jpoiret.xyz (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 640EA185455;
 Tue,  6 Feb 2024 10:58:37 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jpoiret.xyz; s=dkim;
 t=1707217117;
 h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
 to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
 bh=xy3cv9DEJPr9036laIDLEjDT2CxSc9rLJYy8poE04jo=;
 b=ohVqTtU2P9U7h0GlXv7DA/RdMhq9THGXMfEfyilW20udJ4Ld5r6nIJy1SXvr1uPj42eiEq
 q7IiFa4jPIdN3dNlJAiLi3rxeD2HJ/oQLjsfriydjYI30oZI5Jj8Djtz7sRQVyGKLwj3Gd
 eHiJgPfX8jVkVRVjKyLs2H2OP26Is8K3E2O6w+xDXI3z8jKDQAyqkvKK6sc1d7h0xbwvFf
 PxfQ1PSxixLS3kXDJyZuwU15lKUJ4ceSz+IA0co6Uqas9vFHef6jHh98nKK/b6DKQL+4qe
 5TTvvPIYVMoqsi3mIH9U6WpCpH7wUZ4J+4lm7PaeRVisqqINftj8Qo1UBmllgw==
In-Reply-To: <875xz2byuo.fsf@xelera.eu>
References: <20231219200317.Horde.NxE86qlxkYVV15fTcDOD9OV@www.vfemail.net>
 <87h6k1vej7.fsf@gmail.com> <875xz2byuo.fsf@xelera.eu>
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2024 11:58:35 +0100
Message-ID: <878r3xn9k4.fsf@jpoiret.xyz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
 micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Spamd-Bar: /
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
 <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
 <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Reply-to:  Josselin Poiret <dev@jpoiret.xyz>
From:  Josselin Poiret via Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix@gnu.org>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org
Sender: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org
X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN
X-Migadu-Country: US
X-Migadu-Scanner: mx10.migadu.com
X-Spam-Score: -6.77
X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 42AC379165
X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -6.77
X-TUID: 76GvDW9mMPve

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Giovanni,

Giovanni Biscuolo <g@xelera.eu> writes:

> Sorry I don't understand the problem, could you expand please?
>
> The guix (and daemon) versione are those of the channel used when
> creating the install .iso image; booting the 1.40 installer we get a
> "guix version" and "guix describe" value of 989a391...

Not exactly, to include Guix inside the installer image, it somehow
needs to refer to itself.  The way it used to be done was by using the
`guix` package, which necessarily is older than the current commit.
However, we also implemented the `current-guix` hack that basically uses
a guix checkout at the current guix version as the source for the guix
package.  In both cases though, we shouldn't see any differences in
other package's derivations=E2=80=A6

Best,
=2D-=20
Josselin Poiret

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=Cvt7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--