From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id +JP8HDclg2BEBAEAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 21:51:19 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id aB2FGDclg2CeKQAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 19:51:19 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 868981DE2F for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 21:51:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:56590 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1la1pc-0004EQ-Ge for larch@yhetil.org; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 15:51:16 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44378) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1la1pO-0004CN-Lv for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 15:51:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:55597) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1la1pO-00036G-DI for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 15:51:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1la1pO-0006by-Am for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 15:51:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#47980: guix patches debuggs not supporting TLS? Resent-From: Zelphir Kaltstahl Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 19:51:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 47980 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 47980@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.161920740625321 (code B ref -1); Fri, 23 Apr 2021 19:51:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Apr 2021 19:50:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38910 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1la1oT-0006aK-Gy for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 15:50:06 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:55136) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1la1fC-0006M3-LH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 15:40:31 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42456) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1la1fB-0002Bo-Ng for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 15:40:30 -0400 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:50229) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1la1f6-0004za-FD for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 15:40:29 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3759E2400FD for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 21:40:21 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1619206822; bh=NYvYlQsff8O/XAJubOl0wFubR7dAMuZiZR498oT315o=; h=From:Subject:To:Date:From; b=mQTWE9CnbBLpUw5xrtPMLeXqZo7AVjb+mHuvXBNWClYdDsgP2VzAKzEJbeaxhOJjs WGLTN9b2ZRStrt9hNlg+ppm9nburYgkNQC5Nk5NPUYQd2D7VlvOFM37uactZtWZ81z xr8FbS9NjqBgvA0tKE2yrXHDMfK3uaD7W3SFMCBli2LWCeWtboI9e0jjc6PYs1rlBV Sgd+5Mwayn+yT7+UILCZFxwHEaLL1jXwal04CDkSFln7WhOTqTzcguAiekxKDR7iMx GRbeFiCCqWNCi3Ow/A9U97N8GikF0LPGC8byet7qDLW7x9tzbLc8QApA7V6tVQS0Wi xntxf1r6SNf3A== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4FRl4j1NS3z9rxM for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 21:40:20 +0200 (CEST) From: Zelphir Kaltstahl Message-ID: <878e62c8-a2bf-9465-bb45-9f9fc86729ae@posteo.de> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 19:40:14 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------D421816CBD4A5C5183EF6BC6" Content-Language: en-US Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=zelphirkaltstahl@posteo.de; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 15:50:03 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1619207479; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe: list-post:dkim-signature; bh=xVgQTOpVTiQ1Wf7JerTEcNyBjozT2of0+KwAHnIQi9c=; b=sfjir1jlB760/n2rnY9NJc7O0PfELWA8t/1IYHiLUeJj0z2T6hcUmEoCNcT2bEr24ibMSF KTgWvjI0xIXbXI50FaV5ZpZYWyhok5JKwxzlkW7gUg5W8i1RXSA16L1+TXjSfc5dpOs/ap JTOo6MGCNeoWaSrHZInTsLyLdonxCFuA9L6upWrGZtHApdCbjFFcoxyWVnQaQqFS4K2Kn/ ez+IS4/pwGtQIQmUXGzOeJTA4wJrdZvVVz8q3i+Xo4EjgZq/6CW/41G8VZm7foWgxjtY/J 0YLZdbIfmRI6W/J5XFKDVRFjaaX5lIKMzbHTUDo/UYDVt1Vgovl56WneJrhykA== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1619207479; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=CohXa5YCmjewmF4kErfYu4scqpBPUKng4Ocreh/g4KkCO5ERs0FE8RC0OdEM2yBkqu01Bk jIAYg4hFoz1A83Va0XuX44xUzgsYg3jk59gkiZrIuT+1nebPbVA7oLvd1hg4VSmrqqEkPc 4P1RP1efZX1QUmjm8S3ykoLH7wSbbWy2vaASTBXt/UV28O23tL9mUF+gCgUsk9xEMPydbo lj8bFK+ADdByZ3OSNbpdxdzUh4KBs2Xe/N7GkMM+hAb7jWzr8Ux4DyE7aNZ9QExoNB4GnU 76Vf+yXuANKDnkpRWRar6tMP4CKzA9kFoBp2Rr6JYBNLvUFiSqxX12HwmTCgSg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=posteo.de header.s=2017 header.b=mQTWE9Cn; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (strict)" header.from=posteo.de (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -0.34 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=posteo.de header.s=2017 header.b=mQTWE9Cn; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (strict)" header.from=posteo.de (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 868981DE2F X-Spam-Score: -0.34 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: i/IBm9edtsIq This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------D421816CBD4A5C5183EF6BC6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello Guix developers, I am not sure, this is the correct list to write to about this. When I send an e-mail to the guix bug list, the debbugs backend assigns a number and so on. But whenever I reply to the debbugs address, I get an error: "Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender" from my mail provider. The diagnostics code is: ~~~~ Reporting-MTA: dns; mout02.posteo.de X-Postfix-Queue-ID: ADDDE1A00BE X-Postfix-Sender: rfc822; zelphirkaltstahl@posteo.de Arrival-Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 21:32:12 +0200 (CEST) Final-Recipient: rfc822; 47545@debbugs.gnu.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;47545@debbugs.gnu.org Action: failed Status: 5.7.4 Diagnostic-Code: X-Postfix; TLS is required, but was not offered by host debbugs.gnu.org[209.51.188.43] ~~~~ To me it seems that guix bug initially offers TLS, but that the debbugs backend somehow does not and since my e-mail client is set to always use TLS, the e-mail cannot be properly sent. This makes it impossible to stick to debbugs threads identified by the bug numbers. Can anything be done to accept TLS there or is there some reasoning, for it having to not be enabled? Or perhaps I am getting the error completely wrong and it means something different? Best regards, Zelphir -- repositories: https://notabug.org/ZelphirKaltstahl --------------D421816CBD4A5C5183EF6BC6 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hello Guix developers,

I am not sure, this is the correct list to write to about this.

When I send an e-mail to the guix bug list, the debbugs backend assigns a number and so on. But whenever I reply to the debbugs address, I get an error: "Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender" from my mail provider. The diagnostics code is:

~~~~
Reporting-MTA: dns; mout02.posteo.de
X-Postfix-Queue-ID: ADDDE1A00BE
X-Postfix-Sender: rfc822; zelphirkaltstahl@posteo.de
Arrival-Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 21:32:12 +0200 (CEST)

Final-Recipient: rfc822; 47545@debbugs.gnu.org
Original-Recipient: rfc822;47545@debbugs.gnu.org
Action: failed
Status: 5.7.4
Diagnostic-Code: X-Postfix; TLS is required, but was not offered by host
    debbugs.gnu.org[209.51.188.43]
~~~~

To me it seems that guix bug initially offers TLS, but that the debbugs backend somehow does not and since my e-mail client is set to always use TLS, the e-mail cannot be properly sent. This makes it impossible to stick to debbugs threads identified by the bug numbers.

Can anything be done to accept TLS there or is there some reasoning, for it having to not be enabled? Or perhaps I am getting the error completely wrong and it means something different?

Best regards,
Zelphir

-- 
repositories: https://notabug.org/ZelphirKaltstahl
--------------D421816CBD4A5C5183EF6BC6--