From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: Guix paper Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 21:59:30 +0200 Message-ID: <877gk8dejh.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87vc8ppry6.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49144) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UQNeo-0004AF-OF for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 15:59:44 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UQNen-0007rl-4l for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 15:59:42 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0b:1:123:ca0a:a9ff:fe03:271e] (port=55834 helo=xanadu.aquilenet.fr) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UQNem-0007kp-UA for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 15:59:41 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xanadu.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54E0EC966 for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 21:59:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from xanadu.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (xanadu.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ekmE6Vd0e3jg for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 21:59:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pluto (reverse-83.fdn.fr [80.67.176.83]) by xanadu.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CE5D6C06A for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 21:59:30 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <87vc8ppry6.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Sun, 17 Mar 2013 23:44:17 +0100") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: bug-guix@gnu.org ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) skribis: > I submitted (just in time!) a paper about Guix for ELS 2013 [1]. > > http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/tmp/guix-els2013-submitted.pdf I=E2=80=99m happy to say that the paper was accepted. :-) I don=E2=80=99t think I can quote the review, so I=E2=80=99ll paraphrase. = On the positive side, it says the paper is =E2=80=9Ceasy to read=E2=80=9D, that it= =E2=80=99s an interesting topic that applies functional programming to =E2=80=9Creal life= =E2=80=9D, and that the motivations (providing a Scheme API & environment) are clearly stated. On the negative side, it notes that the examples are not always convincing, such as the auto-updater. The reviewer also considered that illustrations of how to customize =E2=80=98gnu-build-system=E2=80=99 were l= acking. The role of the Nix daemon, and its connection with Guix was considered unclear. The reviewer did not understand how dependencies can be expressed. I=E2=80=99ll address these comments for the final version, which is due for= next month. Ludo=E2=80=99.