From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jelle Licht <jlicht@fsfe.org>
Subject: bug#34526: Updating node.js
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 14:59:45 +0100
Message-ID: <877edud0ha.fsf@fsfe.org>
References: <87d0npb1tx.fsf@atufi.org> <877edw6cta.fsf@fsfe.org>
	<87h8cz20ic.fsf@atufi.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:44052)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1gwTn5-0002aY-Iq
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 10:28:10 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1gwTn3-0000Y3-QU
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 10:28:07 -0500
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:57550)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1gwTn3-0000PP-Ho
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 10:28:05 -0500
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1gwSPq-00006C-M6
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 09:00:04 -0500
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.34526.B34526.1550671192323@debbugs.gnu.org>
In-reply-to: <87h8cz20ic.fsf@atufi.org>
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix/>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "bug-Guix" <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Daniel Gerber <dg@atufi.org>
Cc: Jelle Licht <jlicht@fsfe.org>, 34526@debbugs.gnu.org


Daniel Gerber <dg@atufi.org> writes:

>   [snip]
> What about statically linking llhttp's C "sources" included in
> node?   Building v11.10.0 succeeds with this:
>

You could do this, of course, but afaics this is not acceptable for
inclusion in Guix proper.

I don't really see any way forward between convincing the fine node
folks to see the 'error of their ways', or to implement a ABI-compatible
replacement for llhttp that we can actually bootstrap.