From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: bug#38529: Make --ad-hoc the default for guix environment proposed deprecation mechanism Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2019 20:09:23 +0100 Message-ID: <877e2cnwgs.fsf@elephly.net> References: <87eexeu8mo.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87k16vdise.fsf@gnu.org> <87zhfp2w11.fsf@web.de> <871rt03shq.fsf@web.de> <87zhfn3hgj.fsf@web.de> <87tv5upttv.fsf@elephly.net> <87o8w1mxjt.fsf@gnu.org> <87blrqp2pp.fsf@euandre.org> <878smu85kw.fsf@gnu.org> <87tv5h7t0j.fsf@gnu.org> <87eewlo6yp.fsf@elephly.net> <87tv5gxt7x.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59530) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1imMu4-0007hb-PC for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 14:10:05 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1imMu3-0000rQ-P4 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 14:10:04 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:57371) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1imMu3-0000rE-Ly for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 14:10:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1imMu2-0007CK-FZ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 14:10:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-reply-to: <87tv5gxt7x.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: GNU Guix maintainers , 38529@debbugs.gnu.org Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > Maybe =E2=80=9Cunion=E2=80=9D, =E2=80=9Csurround=E2=80=9D, or=E2=80=A6 = =E2=80=9Cprofile=E2=80=9D? =E2=80=9Cprofile=E2=80=9D is a tempting choice, but it=E2=80=99s treacherou= s because we might be blinded by the glow of the implementation of environments as volatile profiles. On the other hand: if we could also move some of the features of the =E2=80=9Cpackage=E2=80=9D sub-command under =E2=80=9Cprofile=E2=80= =9D (e.g. those that relate to the management of, well, profiles), that could be a winning move. Tricky. > (I=E2=80=99d reserve =E2=80=9Cguix spawn=E2=80=9D or =E2=80=9Cguix run=E2= =80=9D for the tool that runs commands > in a least-authority environment, as we=E2=80=99ve discussed in the past.) Same. -- Ricardo