From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix@gnu.org>
Subject: bug#39575: guix time-machine fails when a tarball was modified
 in-place
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 16:02:59 +0100
Message-ID: <877e0l6yu4.fsf@nckx>
References: <87y2t7j54n.fsf@gnu.org> <87eeuy2mua.fsf@gnu.org>
 <CAJ3okZ0TsUwD29L1=kmBaDdfJbB+GzUqUB8ohbETyXskm+Lz4A@mail.gmail.com>
 <87tv3ticcx.fsf@gnu.org> <87r1yxe1z7.fsf@gnu.org> <87tv3tgtv2.fsf@gnu.org>
 <CAJ3okZ00U062A0aa8ppxTQA+7z=bo9p03NyrUL6Wk2o4gjq6Cw@mail.gmail.com>
 <875zg78vsk.fsf@nckx>
 <CAJ3okZ3NPiLPYt6ESVxxCeybPd4j-4SfhP47KZ4OwTbkA=+PNg@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@tobias.gr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
 micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39031)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1j3hvO-00044r-TX
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 10:03:07 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1j3hvK-0007Mz-3M
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 10:03:06 -0500
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:33077)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1j3hvJ-0007Md-RM
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 10:03:02 -0500
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1j3hvJ-0004Zb-OC
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 10:03:01 -0500
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.39575.B39575.158195176117554@debbugs.gnu.org>
In-reply-to: <CAJ3okZ3NPiLPYt6ESVxxCeybPd4j-4SfhP47KZ4OwTbkA=+PNg@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
 <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
 <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Sender: "bug-Guix" <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
To: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>
Cc: 39575@debbugs.gnu.org

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

zimoun =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A
> You assume that Debian packs packages as fast as Guix

Indeed I do!  :-D

Efraim's solution sounds reasonable.

Kind regards,

T G-R

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=dyIZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--