From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marius Bakke Subject: bug#40079: emacs-elpy-1.31.0: failed to build Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 23:32:25 +0100 Message-ID: <877dze7j46.fsf@devup.no> References: <170df3c9d14.f2220d0233452.7833229319796639139@zoho.com> <87d0969ae6.fsf@devup.no> <87v9mylmd7.fsf@elephly.net> <87tv2iisvw.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54844) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jFQCN-0005pi-BP for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 18:33:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jFQCM-00048M-7k for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 18:33:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:39804) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jFQCL-00048B-PK for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 18:33:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jFQCL-0006Fb-Ls for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 18:33:01 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87tv2iisvw.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Maxim Cournoyer , Ricardo Wurmus Cc: sirgazil , 40079@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Maxim Cournoyer writes: > Ricardo Wurmus writes: > >> Marius Bakke writes: >> >>> sirgazil via Bug reports for GNU Guix writes: >>> >>>> I couldn't upgrade the packages in my user profile because "emacs-elpy= " check phase fails.=20 >>>> >>>> >>>> ## Steps to reproduce >>>> >>>> 1. guix pull >>>> 2. guix build emacs-elpy >>>> >>>> >>>> ## Unexpected result >>>> >>>> >>>> The output of the check phase: >>>> >>>> --------------------------- >>>> starting phase `check' >>>> >>>> Can=E2=80=99t guess python-indent-offset, using defaults: 4 >>> >>> This seems to stem from the update of 'python-black' in >>> 5f603fab23e7df7e7b76566b3add24b65e92f807. Reverting that commit makes >>> this package build. >>> >>> @Ricardo: Any objections to reverting the commit? >> >> I=E2=80=99d rather not revert but add an older variant of python-black f= or elpy. > > Perhaps the issue would vanish if we move to Elpy 1.32? I had started > packaging it, but hit some issues. In any case I'm sure sirgazil is not the only user of this package, so we should try and find a resolution quickly. As a side note, this bug report could have been easily prevented by building the few packages listed by 'guix refresh -l python{,2}-black' before pushing! Not to single out Ricardo here (I forget this too occasionally), but I expect contributors to do this in general and think we should keep a low threshold for reverting breaking commits. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAl51RHkACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPptigf/WJLiOsiK4VFKYN//2UMwYp5DURKKBRACl7o58dYWpuEKiKffvdXMTllJ B/rcG9fAkilrCjfCfsCT8cC0VLpgHee6OwA7c3ZhStuuJHuTF9iLLbnO/k6kzarO stU4h0s79JzcstnfTI0whgkATbo2jbE39lTOn8cyWW6facdDljFfKcgte26hsuas //LXZCUAiIx/x4oAJQWBOYYOXJf2v9B50+5B8kCWTd5mbSDkBsjxmCVg8VmVRup6 pEiDl6LgrpfSkONic+Gy90nMdSnFqLsRmeV6PitrJkyY9VbRS0moTLHaq6T4b9uH i+Aw2Go9IrZPBPFxOCr73IxU0cvJ/Q== =3mwz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--