From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id qALLBwA5s14QdgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 06 May 2020 22:24:00 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id ICBDBAw5s175AgAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 06 May 2020 22:24:12 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142::17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07361940B6B for ; Wed, 6 May 2020 22:24:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:54928 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jWSSX-0007oc-27 for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 06 May 2020 18:24:09 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33364) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jWSSQ-0007oV-Kk for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 06 May 2020 18:24:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:58193) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jWSSQ-0001N9-C3 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 06 May 2020 18:24:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jWSSQ-0008Gc-9A for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 06 May 2020 18:24:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#41116: Guix deploy fails with new version of Herd Resent-From: Alex Sassmannshausen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 06 May 2020 22:24:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 41116 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 41116@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.158880383131756 (code B ref -1); Wed, 06 May 2020 22:24:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 May 2020 22:23:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41506 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jWSSE-0008G7-SA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 May 2020 18:23:51 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:60152) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jWSQG-0008CR-0f for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 May 2020 18:21:48 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:32884) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jWSQF-0007hA-RN for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 06 May 2020 18:21:47 -0400 Received: from www140.your-server.de ([88.198.28.10]:56478) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jWSQE-0007RB-9d for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 06 May 2020 18:21:47 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=komputilo.eu; s=default1904; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date: Reply-To:Subject:To:From:Sender:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=jaWMTbyp/qJ1MymZgslIatKJy466rfEHuXqFT7zC03I=; b=lomYOpEDKl+jBd7UPzrhG95nJd 1IvBjByubhBjZO5ozW2hKi1w/0YuVzLuHpl9PaRvn4CoueuFPbEQF3qVYO1QPYs1Z/s2Czj5gMkBx DpdgS7n3D8QKyeRGYDo79ION1xudJp9wsHCyq64vfc7IQ79P9umn+eL3QilmsZ1LZct+KWzlXDBR1 kVHjMtf3pgY8wgJDyZMDGr+gj2lQepl/tC00rzxb5OrUCp0EQzaQlUZ8LoAwziNsdgdTgHi8hsxqg DcQ9mG0lX3//l1D0GINkVoGccFtC4wPAlWTVv17ChFqD+qXFcYt76MtplS5sGM8bbkZZkJ66eL/k4 8maatFRA==; Received: from sslproxy02.your-server.de ([78.47.166.47]) by www140.your-server.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.3) (envelope-from ) id 1jWSQ4-0000RO-Qh for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 07 May 2020 00:21:36 +0200 Received: from [2a02:a03f:643c:5900:f200:b379:1817:18a7] (helo=watership) by sslproxy02.your-server.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jWSQ4-000WzS-Md for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 07 May 2020 00:21:36 +0200 User-agent: mu4e 1.2.0; emacs 26.3 Date: Thu, 07 May 2020 00:21:36 +0200 Message-ID: <877dxog0wf.fsf@komputilo.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Authenticated-Sender: alex@komputilo.eu X-Virus-Scanned: Clear (ClamAV 0.102.2/25804/Wed May 6 14:13:11 2020) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=88.198.28.10; envelope-from=alex@komputilo.eu; helo=www140.your-server.de X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/05/06 18:21:37 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x (no timestamps) [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 06 May 2020 18:23:49 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" Reply-to: alex@komputilo.eu, Alex Sassmannshausen From: Alex Sassmannshausen via Bug reports for GNU Guix X-Scanner: scn0 X-Spam-Score: -0.01 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=komputilo.eu header.s=default1904 header.b=lomYOpED; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 2001:470:142::17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Scan-Result: default: False [-0.01 / 13.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[alex@komputilo.eu]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; GENERIC_REPUTATION(0.00)[-0.49716516430637]; DWL_DNSWL_FAIL(0.00)[2001:470:142::17:server fail]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2001:470:142::/48:c]; IP_REPUTATION_HAM(0.00)[asn: 22989(0.11), country: US(-0.00), ip: 2001:470:142::17(-0.50)]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_REJECT(1.00)[komputilo.eu:s=default1904]; MX_GOOD(-0.50)[cached: eggs.gnu.org]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[komputilo.eu:-]; MAILLIST(-0.20)[mailman]; FORGED_RECIPIENTS_MAILLIST(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_FAIL(0.00)[2001:470:142::17:server fail]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:22989, ipnet:2001:470:142::/48, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[larch=yhetil.org]; HAS_X_AS(0.00)[]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[bug-guix@gnu.org,bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; REPLYTO_DOM_NEQ_FROM_DOM(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[gnu.org]; HAS_LIST_UNSUB(-0.01)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_COUNT_SEVEN(0.00)[11]; FORGED_SENDER_MAILLIST(0.00)[] X-TUID: RldrJx0fjYvh Hello, I maintain a number of servers using Guix deploy. It seems that the recent upgrade to Herd in Guix, and specifically commit 4c0cc7bed3de2c0e2d3a6e95b88693941e839eec might have introduced a bug. >From my testing, guix deploy currently consistently fails with: -----------------8<----------------------------->8------------------- ice-9/boot-9.scm:1667:16: In procedure raise-exception: ERROR: 1. &inferior-exception: arguments: (srfi-34 #" "Unrecognized keyword" () (#:file-creation-mask))] 7eff2bd7be00>>) inferior: #f stack: () -----------------8<----------------------------->8------------------- A workaround is to build the system configuration locally on the target server, then to reconfigure. It will still error at the same place, but at this point, after restarting the server, the new version of Herd will be running and both deploy and reconfigure will work. I don't know what a good solution to this could be, but it may be something we need to consider in future development of Herd. Best wishes, Alex