From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id aWUoBmy1AmBhDgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 09:44:12 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id GHRjAWy1AmCccAAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 09:44:12 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BE219402A9 for ; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 09:44:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:53856 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l0i7t-0003c6-RQ for larch@yhetil.org; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 04:44:09 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51552) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l0i7m-0003bw-SM for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 04:44:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:59107) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l0i7m-00082s-7s for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 04:44:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l0i7m-0003gM-5S for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 04:44:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#45826: SBCL / Common Lisp packages fail to build on aarch64 Resent-From: Guillaume Le Vaillant Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2021 09:44:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45826 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Leo Famulari Received: via spool by 45826-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B45826.161079019014084 (code B ref 45826); Sat, 16 Jan 2021 09:44:02 +0000 Received: (at 45826) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Jan 2021 09:43:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42420 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l0i6v-0003f6-U3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 04:43:10 -0500 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:41601) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l0i6t-0003eX-2a for 45826@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 04:43:08 -0500 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4BA116005C for <45826@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 10:43:00 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1610790180; bh=LoHYc601hBg+FFSJ1N7iu0VZIxYVfcfzY8iN+hJjVuw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=hDt25bUCGm1q07KrOxEQT4InUd3OXDIFUKYmEFBtHLUJiJVfC3OylK+vDHgx2wpEv jF1BeO2+PBkbZdqzhhlcny31FOjFJoP9FNSupGP/7fC03v095CfaiU+rnIBJW5YkbA FE/sKsvY/ROc4tnXYF6vDm7/0O6jBmr7FB1pVyz3AFKVdJ9evDS/sM2aLneOXrbdfW mGSyrcB1OY+wzubQcmjjsQ/R91uYcuFHbFxKlblTkyv1fNB4FAxGNscUxVYfFdm5gG UteszQk1wMrJKuhQNuSAXWjUIUjZhWGT9z2CxuvLHV21LYVlsEociMox4116vZ0l1b jUcYigE+6Is5g== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4DHtQC595Vz6tm5; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 10:42:59 +0100 (CET) References: <87eeioczws.fsf@yamatai> User-agent: mu4e 1.4.14; emacs 27.1 From: Guillaume Le Vaillant In-reply-to: Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2021 10:42:58 +0100 Message-ID: <877dod1al9.fsf@yamatai> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 45826@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.36 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=hDt25bUC; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (strict)" header.from=posteo.net (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 0BE219402A9 X-Spam-Score: -1.36 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: a1/dU6G39SIt --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Leo Famulari skribis: > On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 10:03:47PM +0100, Guillaume Le Vaillant wrote: >> I tried to bootstrap sbcl using ecl instead of clisp, using >> "guix build -s aarch64-linux sbcl" on a x86-64 machine because I don't >> have any arm64 hardware, but it failed with the same memory fault. > > Thanks! On #guix, Efraim reported that the builds were succeeding on his > aarch64 hardware. So, I'm not sure what's going on :/ When taking a look at the logs of failing builds of sbcl-* packages on aarch64-linux (for example at [1] for master or at [2] for staging), I saw that the build jobs try to build sbcl (which is currently failing) for every package. I would have expected the builds for sbcl-* packages to be marked as "failed because missing dependency" given that the main dependency of the asdf-build-system/sbcl failed to build. Instead the build farm is trying to rebuild sbcl over and over, which wastes quite some time and resources. It looks like the dependencies of the build system are not considered as dependencies for the packages that use this build system. Am I missing something? [1] https://ci.guix.gnu.org/eval/31355?status=failed [2] https://ci.guix.gnu.org/eval/20644?status=failed --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIUEAREKAC0WIQTLxZxm7Ce5cXlAaz5r6CCK3yH+PwUCYAK1Ig8cZ2x2QHBvc3Rl by5uZXQACgkQa+ggit8h/j9h4AD+MBEdQORhMvPrvaJZVVljTjiw19ooig9SRpJU R71vvvYA/2fPqVnhZtiGpghQZzNCEYlON93rUj4f4rKtlexnjt+g =9u/D -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--