* bug#73816: python-django's manage.py tries to use a hard-coded python executable
@ 2024-10-15 9:48 Gabriel Wicki
2024-12-10 15:59 ` Simon Tournier
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Gabriel Wicki @ 2024-10-15 9:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 73816
The python-django package makes the admin utility create a manage.py
file with a hard-coded python interpreter.
$ guix shell python python-django -- django-admin startproject foobar
$ head -n 1 foobar/manage.py
#!/gnu/store/my2j5bzapayk59971z2ryzlajdz569f9-python-toolchain-3.10.7/bin/python
I think this is wrong. The interpreter line should be
#!/usr/bin/env python3
Or am I wrong?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* bug#73816: python-django's manage.py tries to use a hard-coded python executable
2024-10-15 9:48 bug#73816: python-django's manage.py tries to use a hard-coded python executable Gabriel Wicki
@ 2024-12-10 15:59 ` Simon Tournier
2024-12-11 11:48 ` Gabriel Wicki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Simon Tournier @ 2024-12-10 15:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gabriel Wicki, 73816
Hi,
On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 at 11:48, Gabriel Wicki <gabriel@erlikon.ch> wrote:
> The python-django package makes the admin utility create a manage.py
> file with a hard-coded python interpreter.
>
> $ guix shell python python-django -- django-admin startproject foobar
> $ head -n 1 foobar/manage.py
> #!/gnu/store/my2j5bzapayk59971z2ryzlajdz569f9-python-toolchain-3.10.7/bin/python
>
> I think this is wrong. The interpreter line should be
>
> #!/usr/bin/env python3
Well, I don’t know if there is a rationale for this choice. Somehow, my
understanding is: 1. python-django is byte-compiled using one specific
Python interpreter and 2. what is the guarantee that the whole code
byte-compiled with different Python interpreter will run?
Hence, that version of the specific Python interpreter is encoded.
Now, if the purpose of ’django-admin startproject foobar’ is to only
create generic configuration that does not depends on any Django or
Python version, then maybe it could be considered as wrong. :-)
Else I don’t know. I remember having a similar discussion about a
similar Python tool but I am not able to find it back.
Cheers,
simon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* bug#73816: python-django's manage.py tries to use a hard-coded python executable
2024-12-10 15:59 ` Simon Tournier
@ 2024-12-11 11:48 ` Gabriel Wicki
2024-12-13 11:57 ` Simon Tournier
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Gabriel Wicki @ 2024-12-11 11:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Simon Tournier; +Cc: 73816
Hi!
Thanks for your input!
On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 04:59:27PM +0100, Simon Tournier wrote:
> Now, if the purpose of ’django-admin startproject foobar’ is to only
> create generic configuration that does not depends on any Django or
> Python version, then maybe it could be considered as wrong. :-)
I think this is actually the case! The `startproject' script
initializes a more or less empty project including said `manage.py'
script. Now when starting and developing a Django project, all these
files will end up in VCS, might be packaged somewhat later on (if at
all) and executed on a different system, which may or may not have Guix
available. Apart from that, hard-coding that script without any
guarantee whatsoever that this path exists in the system that will run
the code will more likely result in a failure than any kind of success.
If you have any idea on how to patch that and could point me in that
direction, I'll gladly send in a patch or two!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* bug#73816: python-django's manage.py tries to use a hard-coded python executable
2024-12-11 11:48 ` Gabriel Wicki
@ 2024-12-13 11:57 ` Simon Tournier
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Simon Tournier @ 2024-12-13 11:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gabriel Wicki; +Cc: 73816
Hi,
On Wed, 11 Dec 2024 at 12:48, Gabriel Wicki <gabriel@erlikon.ch> wrote:
> If you have any idea on how to patch that and could point me in that
> direction, I'll gladly send in a patch or two!
It needs to replace the phases something like:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
gnu/packages/django.scm | 16 ++++++++++++++++
modified gnu/packages/django.scm
@@ -99,6 +99,22 @@ (define-public python-django-4.2
(setenv "PYTHONPATH" "..")
(apply invoke "python" "runtests.py" test-flags))
(format #t "test suite not run~%"))))
+ (replace 'patch-source-shebangs
+ (lambda _
+ (for-each patch-shebang
+ (find-files "."
+ (lambda (file stat)
+ (and (eq? 'regular (stat:type stat))
+ (not (string-suffix? "py-tpl" file))))
+ #:stat lstat))))
+ (replace 'patch-generated-file-shebangs
+ (lambda _
+ (for-each patch-shebang
+ (find-files "."
+ (lambda (file stat)
+ (and (eq? 'regular (stat:type stat))
+ (not (string-suffix? "py-tpl" file))))
+ #:stat lstat))))
;; XXX: The 'wrap' phase adds native inputs as runtime dependencies,
;; see <https://bugs.gnu.org/25235>. The django-admin script typically
;; runs in an environment that has Django and its dependencies on
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
Feel free to submit a patch. :-)
Cheers,
simon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-12-13 11:59 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-10-15 9:48 bug#73816: python-django's manage.py tries to use a hard-coded python executable Gabriel Wicki
2024-12-10 15:59 ` Simon Tournier
2024-12-11 11:48 ` Gabriel Wicki
2024-12-13 11:57 ` Simon Tournier
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).