From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Love Subject: bug#21111: possibly bogus in binary tarball Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 21:26:49 +0100 Message-ID: <87615cszue.fsf@pc102091.liv.ac.uk> References: <874mkwcspq.fsf@pc102091.liv.ac.uk> <20150722122721.GA6326@debian> <87a8uo6vca.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44135) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZI0bb-0004uQ-P9 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 16:27:12 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZI0bW-00055G-QN for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 16:27:07 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:55212) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZI0bW-00055C-OI for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 16:27:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZI0bW-0007YI-8W for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 16:27:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87a8uo6vca.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?="'s message of "Wed, 22 Jul 2015 17:55:01 +0200") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 21111@debbugs.gnu.org Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > Interestingly, I do not get this message, both with =E2=80=98tar xf=E2=80= =99 and > =E2=80=98tar xvf=E2=80=99 with GNU=C2=A0tar 1.28. > > I tried with different timezones, and I can=E2=80=99t trigger it. > > Dave: What version of GNU=C2=A0tar do you use, and in what timezone? > > TIA, > Ludo=E2=80=99. It was on RHEL6 in the UK zone $ grep -I zone /etc/sysconfig/clock ZONE=3D"Europe/London" =20=20 with: $ rpm -q tar tar-1.23-11.el6.x86_64 There aren't any obviously-relevant patches in the tar package changelog. I think it would be worth a note on the timestamps anyway to avoid confusion and make sure they're maintained, if they should be. (Excuse me if that's done somewhere, but I just went to the current installation instructions.)