From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Kost Subject: bug#31069: emacs-smartparens: sp-forward-barf-sexp broken Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2018 21:21:12 +0300 Message-ID: <876051v9t3.fsf@gmail.com> References: <2f43d561-85df-20da-3e7c-9a991e2b6daa@freenet.de> <87o9ix8nha.fsf@gmail.com> <87o9iultph.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46591) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f5Ex3-0002in-Dc for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Apr 2018 14:22:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f5Ex0-00089m-5g for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Apr 2018 14:22:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:34918) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f5Ex0-00089Z-0G for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Apr 2018 14:22:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f5Ewz-0006BL-MR for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Apr 2018 14:22:01 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87o9iultph.fsf@gmail.com> (Oleg Pykhalov's message of "Sat, 07 Apr 2018 22:09:14 +0300") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Oleg Pykhalov Cc: 31069@debbugs.gnu.org Oleg Pykhalov (2018-04-07 22:09 +0300) wrote: > Thorsten Wilms writes: > >> On 05.04.2018 21:25, Alex Kost wrote: >> >>> It probably wouldn't help but... all these commands work for me without >>> any error (I use smartparens 1.11 installed with Guix). > > [=E2=80=A6] > >> 1.11 here, too. > > I'm on 1.11 and GuixSD have the same issue. > >> That piece of configuration doesn't affect the issue; but now I can >> say that it doesn't matter if smartparens-mode or >> smartparens-strict-mode or neither is active, slurp works, barf >> doesn't. > > Same for me. Hm, barf commands definitely work for me. Maybe I just should update my emacs packages to reproduce it (although I use smartparens 1.11 but I have not updated my profile for several months) :-) --=20 Alex