From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: bug#31159: Reverse order for old grub.cfg entries Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 16:04:44 +0200 Message-ID: <87604oy5j7.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87h8odb1fo.fsf@aikidev.net> <87y3hnnru3.fsf@netris.org> <87a7u2qmd4.fsf@gmail.com> <878t9llmr7.fsf@netris.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34929) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f8nho-0003y2-S8 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Apr 2018 10:05:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f8nhm-00087v-6l for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Apr 2018 10:05:04 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:51552) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f8nhm-00087q-32 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Apr 2018 10:05:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f8nhl-00051v-RM for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Apr 2018 10:05:01 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <878t9llmr7.fsf@netris.org> (Mark H. Weaver's message of "Tue, 17 Apr 2018 14:18:52 -0400") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Mark H Weaver Cc: Vagrant Cascadian , 31159@debbugs.gnu.org Hello, Mark H Weaver skribis: > Mathieu Othacehe writes: > >> This seems like a good idea ! If we decide to make it unconditional the >> patch attached does the job. We can also make it configurable in >> bootloader-configuration for instance. >> >> WDYT ? > > Thank you, Mathieu! I doubt that there's a need to make this > configurable, but I'd like to hear an opinion from Ludovic, since I > guess he was the one who implemented the current ordering. > > What do you think, Ludovic? I agree with you. As long as the entry labels clearly show which one is the most recent, that sounds good. However! On headless machines, we=E2=80=99d rather make sure users know ab= out this change. On our Libreboot =E2=80=9Cbayfront=E2=80=9D server, GRUB for = some reason fails to display anything, and on several occasions we=E2=80=99ve had to bl= indly select an older generation. Hopefully this is an unusual situation ;-), but it could happen on ARM boards as well. Ludo=E2=80=99.