From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: bug#31841: ./pre-inst-env guix system no longer works without ~/.config/guix Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2018 18:51:58 +0200 Message-ID: <87602kro0h.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8736xopz0q.fsf@netris.org> <87bmccuwbu.fsf@mdc-berlin.de> <87o9gctgrm.fsf@gnu.org> <87po0snp5g.fsf@netris.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47725) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fTryB-00010J-C6 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jun 2018 12:53:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fTryA-00035h-Da for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jun 2018 12:53:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:42692) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fTryA-00034b-A6 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jun 2018 12:53:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fTryA-0005Wq-0K for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jun 2018 12:53:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87po0snp5g.fsf@netris.org> (Mark H. Weaver's message of "Fri, 15 Jun 2018 09:40:59 -0400") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Mark H Weaver Cc: 31841@debbugs.gnu.org, Ricardo Wurmus Hello, Mark H Weaver skribis: > ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: [...] >> I=E2=80=99m a bit reluctant to that, in part because it=E2=80=99s a deve= lopment >> environment where we can have different expectations IMO. > > If there's a good reason to avoid implementing Ricardo's suggestion, I > don't mind keeping my modified 'guix' script above, but I confess that I > don't yet understand the cause of your reluctance. Well I=E2=80=99m not opposed to it, but my first reaction was that it adds complexity, it=E2=80=99s redundant with the =E2=80=98configure=E2=80=99 che= cks, and one can always find other ways to make things break. Now, I agree that it would be useful for the use case you mentioned (build in =E2=80=98guix environment=E2=80=99 and run outside of it), so if = you come up with a patch, that works for me! > Anyway, it seems that my practice of running 'guix' from a private git > checkout is becoming increasingly awkward to arrange. I would be > pleased if this mode of operation were better supported. I do that (like every Guix developer I suppose) every day, so I don=E2=80= =99t think it=E2=80=99s going to stop working any time soon. In this case, the requirement of a new dependency made the issue apparent but fundamentally nothing has changed. In particular, ~/.config/guix is not required any more than it was before, contrary to what the subject says. OK to close this issue? Ludo=E2=80=99.