From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: bug#35662: Really relocatable binaries crash with Permission denied Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 13:10:19 +0200 Message-ID: <875zqairj8.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20190511050518.ozmvhsov6meg6g5f@pelzflorian.localdomain> <87ftpivlnv.fsf@gnu.org> <20190513103440.xkri3uk2oxtk4rn6@pelzflorian.localdomain> <87r292qx30.fsf@gnu.org> <20190513151736.ffbuofr3vmyqaoov@pelzflorian.localdomain> <87tvdyozra.fsf@gnu.org> <20190513204524.ozcnp6faamrbfkcv@pelzflorian.localdomain> <20190514080525.xspgsob6payn2ioa@pelzflorian.localdomain> <87h89wydf7.fsf@gnu.org> <87pnojd9s6.fsf@roquette.mug.biscuolo.net> <20190516110257.f3ftexzyk2c5akw5@pelzflorian.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:33281) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hREU7-0000Zs-DU for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 16 May 2019 07:23:40 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hREHv-0008Cp-JH for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 16 May 2019 07:11:04 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:40890) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hREHv-0008CC-EJ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 16 May 2019 07:11:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hREHu-0001Dm-H1 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 16 May 2019 07:11:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20190516110257.f3ftexzyk2c5akw5@pelzflorian.localdomain> (pelzflorian@pelzflorian.de's message of "Thu, 16 May 2019 13:02:57 +0200") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" Cc: 35662@debbugs.gnu.org Hello, "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" skribis: > From a Guix point of view, I believe this maybe should be a > WONT-FIX/NOT-OUR-BUG. Sounds good to me. :-) Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.