From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jelle Licht Subject: bug#37421: [PATCH] gnu: node: Disable tests that fail with openssl@1.1.1d. Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 16:43:47 +0200 Message-ID: <875zlr0yqk.fsf@jlicht.xyz> References: <877e6839f0.fsf@wioo.waw.pl> <20190916135228.22045-1-me@tobias.gr> <87ef0g5ilf.fsf@gnu.org> <87o8zkar6z.fsf@nckx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55232) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iAEi3-00004w-FR for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 10:44:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iAEi2-0007aq-8B for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 10:44:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:44304) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iAEi2-0007ab-4r for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 10:44:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iAEi2-000517-0h for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 10:44:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87o8zkar6z.fsf@nckx> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice , Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 37421@debbugs.gnu.org Tobias Geerinckx-Rice writes: > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A >> Could we take a look at what these failures are about to see how=20 >> bad >> that might be? > > Jelle Licht =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A >> Interestingly enough, https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/3881=20 >> notes >> issues with exactly these two tests. Perhaps there is a=20 >> regressions in >> our case? > > Thanks, and indeed! That is _quite_ the coincidence=E2=80=A6 > > Unfortunately, I don't see any mention of a time-out in my logs &=20 > the truncation of the backtrace > > at Object. (=E2=80=A6/test/parallel/test-crypto-dh.js:124:8) > at Module._compile (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:701:30) > at Object.Module._extensions..js=20 > (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:712:10) > at Module.load (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:600:32) > at tryModuleLoad (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:539:12) > at Function.Module._load (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:531:3) > at Function.Module.runMain=20 > (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:754:12) > at startup (internal/bootstrap/node.js:283:19) > at bootstrapNodeJSCore (internal/bootstrap/node.js:622:3) > ... > > happens at run time: grepping the output of =E2=80=98--keep=E2=80=99 does= n't=20 > reveal a more complete one :-( > > I don't know how to hack the tests to spit out more. Someone who=20 > knows node/js more than I do needs to step in and save us. Is=20 > that you, Jelle? :-) I believe in learning by doing, so I'll have a go at it somewhere early next week :-). For now, I think it makes sense to push this patch so we can have a (hopefully) working and secure ungoogled-chromium. > > Kind regards, > > T G-R