From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id aI9TMkGRxV57KgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 20 May 2020 20:21:21 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id cAc8LkGRxV7QLgAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 20 May 2020 20:21:21 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C013F9403EB for ; Wed, 20 May 2020 20:21:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:35116 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jbVDL-0003gn-O7 for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 20 May 2020 16:21:19 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42748) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jbVD4-0003fk-5c for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 20 May 2020 16:21:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42866) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jbVD3-0002vS-Rx for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 20 May 2020 16:21:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jbVD3-0001eE-Ok for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 20 May 2020 16:21:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#41418: Rendered graphs in manual have improperly rendered text Resent-From: Marius Bakke Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 20:21:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 41418 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Carlo Zancanaro Received: via spool by 41418-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B41418.15900060336271 (code B ref 41418); Wed, 20 May 2020 20:21:01 +0000 Received: (at 41418) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 May 2020 20:20:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54410 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jbVCa-0001d4-ST for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 May 2020 16:20:33 -0400 Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.25]:47711) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jbVCZ-0001cn-4s; Wed, 20 May 2020 16:20:31 -0400 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B28E1961; Wed, 20 May 2020 16:20:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 20 May 2020 16:20:25 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.com; h= from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type; s=fm2; bh=ra2yzMhAJDABFNwWw8blSZdTuI WJtSmo3hfqCD8+GRY=; b=sa8bolUQtzOj0XaFEL2yslYOijzHDCImI7V55ES03e WCv1T8z2R6+4vO9DdN1GjXMWfh4UXsJ1is3lSEqTqb8ZgDtdoVvQr6J8Me8SyLST QO5/UZMv3A1e8N9LEAGduqf+GITThIVlS6xYYBqC7NcwLRwwz6yi/ulkg3yrOjYH O2nUyN6RjxOOPQdtAeju5Fa0lLwegEq7LovceCHixVo4VWV3pnQmAI/TMmnr+7Oz pQnDj2VpBWgzbpUGpMet14gfFy1XOuFxh3KjxJq2O2p1D3YChS7hfvEYJocQiGjL r+KHpHYzAMKrwNJuOwlPyZ+B24ce15G9Mru0apOfDWNA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=ra2yzM hAJDABFNwWw8blSZdTuIWJtSmo3hfqCD8+GRY=; b=PFGHodQhM2/gIf0KgZG4Pr c7JK/Pssm0U/RzOoloqGzOw4MlRqplE8la42hFk3KP9KWgLITHgwb2KsH8JtJW4X kJxjuATpoXBvlaub1+h7CLXOEyjDhKKb5wijn7wz2+mFb71s/jcP3rzvjthMhzjO 42ENYJ2luJzE0axIOMNsPCxw+2/m8xSoyIiraWbToxxWLHk3Guv6ceuhdmqN1gGK MNrmq83/nS5FssD9Xn6bksL1oUP2MUowKf+iLpb4rwAfFvH5BKhp7y5TtQ3ctsxB b94Esoemd4USqZmdzuXWR4QezGGmSivNQSftD0+K4q8p5Ft4HtdQV9OvcnZ01X7Q == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedruddtledgudegiecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefhvffujghffffkgggtsehttdertddttddtnecuhfhrohhmpeforghrihhu shcuuegrkhhkvgcuoehmsggrkhhkvgesfhgrshhtmhgrihhlrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrg htthgvrhhnpedtteeiteethfeifedttdejjeelfefgjeeileduffekheehlefgvdfggeeu ffefgeenucfkphepkeegrddvtddvrdeikedrjeehnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd enucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhgsrghkkhgvsehfrghsthhmrghilhdrtgho mh X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (ti0006q161-2604.bb.online.no [84.202.68.75]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 513FF306645F; Wed, 20 May 2020 16:20:24 -0400 (EDT) From: Marius Bakke In-Reply-To: <87d06yvj6e.fsf@zancanaro.id.au> References: <87ftbuvjii.fsf@zancanaro.id.au> <87d06yvj6e.fsf@zancanaro.id.au> Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 22:20:22 +0200 Message-ID: <875zcqbbp5.fsf@devup.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: control@debbugs.gnu.org, 41418@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=fastmail.com header.s=fm2 header.b=sa8bolUQ; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=PFGHodQh; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=fastmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.09 X-TUID: 8xMwECb+in3H merge 41282 41418 thanks Carlo Zancanaro writes: > Apologies, immediately after sending this email I saw #41282, > which is the same bug. I don't know whether it's better to close > this, or to merge them, so I'll leave that up to someone else to > decide. :) I merged them. The main difference is that you will get a notification when it gets fixed. It also aids if someone searches for the problem and finds this report, but not the other.