From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id ICWXIwXmr1/uaAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 14 Nov 2020 14:13:25 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id CH93HwXmr19ObwAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 14 Nov 2020 14:13:25 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1AC79403A9 for ; Sat, 14 Nov 2020 14:13:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:50732 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kdwIs-0002qb-0c for larch@yhetil.org; Sat, 14 Nov 2020 09:13:22 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38388) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kdwIY-0002qL-OW for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Nov 2020 09:13:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38605) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kdwIY-00014m-C7 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Nov 2020 09:13:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kdwIY-0005iV-7U for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Nov 2020 09:13:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#44612: Read standard input in `guix repl' Resent-From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2020 14:13:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44612 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Pierre Neidhardt Cc: 44612@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: bug-guix@gnu.org, 44612@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.160536314321926 (code B ref -1); Sat, 14 Nov 2020 14:13:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Nov 2020 14:12:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50151 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kdwHs-0005hX-94 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Nov 2020 09:12:23 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:39214) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kdwHq-0005hQ-NM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Nov 2020 09:12:18 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38260) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kdwHq-0002fL-Ig for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Nov 2020 09:12:18 -0500 Received: from tobias.gr ([2a02:c205:2020:6054::1]:44360) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kdwHo-0000o1-HT for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Nov 2020 09:12:17 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tobias.gr; s=2018; bh=y0RUY/MTK4Ugho8C1H5reh2iR978011ggt1ldGQQx0c=; h=date:in-reply-to: references:subject:cc:to:from; b=ld+Ezw+7Cw4B1FYENiZW9hruUhaoyPaeIG2qM qA4QzZexgQRHl2xcWSuhHfWpsJR6GG/RY4z6TUTgcYiGQoaUqW/pLC3rZTfrGv3qqAw5Qs xV57ZPX6FDl8jmXpGiFrBYeWYEEAToNBYEnkpgqHJfPcvIRDFpVE05Q1A7qDFxn9PIYdza AQdjQ1y6AsUFA8y0VzI8bcnZhSaGSyev5J2QItQMaoEnIDDwodGjP/aK3KxvQWHH8GWJMj hfplOK0oHr1t5hehBCJQrkEUNtW8cnaW1E1Xfgs5e+l22+PYOR6NG5OIAyvjAgIxpUPzeb GkihXw4gfAUTnlQonb+zU8klg== Received: by submission.tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 1b9785f4 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Sat, 14 Nov 2020 14:12:16 +0000 (UTC) BIMI-Selector: v=BIMI1; s=default; References: <87h7ptzj8t.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87zh3l6lzk.fsf@nckx> <87h7ps8duy.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87lff46v32.fsf@nckx> <87pn4gxe8q.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> In-reply-to: <87pn4gxe8q.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2020 15:12:10 +0100 Message-ID: <875z6858p1.fsf@nckx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a02:c205:2020:6054::1; envelope-from=me@tobias.gr; helo=tobias.gr X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" Reply-to: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix X-Scanner: ns3122888.ip-94-23-21.eu Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (headers rsa verify failed) header.d=tobias.gr header.s=2018 header.b=ld+Ezw+7; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.11 X-TUID: yqosWcXuUEBP --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Pierre Neidhardt =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > Tobias Geerinckx-Rice writes: > >> To =E2=80=98it does not work=E2=80=99 I can reply only that Nyxt doesn't= build=20 >> [log attached] on current master > > Shoot! :p > > Which architecture? Boring old x86_64 I'm afraid. > I builds for me on x86-64 at commit > 403ba4140f52b9ea9483e4c775f102bbb9753e51. I pulled to that commit but it's still the same ungrafted=20 derivation=20 (/gnu/store/bdi8dq8i3f59zxp7jrabas847dh80m7x-nyxt-2-pre-release-4.drv). Building for the fourth time now, with -{M,c}1... ...nope, always the same error: Unhandled ASDF/FIND-COMPONENT:MISSING-DEPENDENCY in thread #: Component "cl-base64" not found, required by # So I'm surprised it does build for you. Weak Lisp-fu or not, that=20 looks pretty deterministic to me. Weird. > Or is it a reproducibility issue? No, it's an error in the =E2=80=98build=E2=80=99 phase. Kind regards, T G-R --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIMEARYKACsWIQT12iAyS4c9C3o4dnINsP+IT1VteQUCX6/lug0cbWVAdG9iaWFz LmdyAAoJEA2w/4hPVW15SWABAKS4mLnPvAfxoVn4LSawPvmpu/uhhODO517dLtrj Fl/0AP9UNXJU0+QECLOcHw1sqCW8Zxnui3eUbSGro3c0yoVrCg== =s89g -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--