From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp10.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms5.migadu.com with LMTPS id vMwdJ7yKbmL0WAAAbAwnHQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 01 May 2022 15:27:24 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp10.migadu.com with LMTPS id OAgnJbyKbmJ3IgAAG6o9tA (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 01 May 2022 15:27:24 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31D3528D57 for ; Sun, 1 May 2022 15:27:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:39058 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nl9be-0000BQ-FO for larch@yhetil.org; Sun, 01 May 2022 09:27:22 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35794) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nl9bK-0000BB-2p for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 01 May 2022 09:27:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:37780) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nl9bJ-00076e-OY for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 01 May 2022 09:27:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nl9bJ-00089I-KW for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 01 May 2022 09:27:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#54786: Installation tests are failing Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 01 May 2022 13:27:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 54786 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Mathieu Othacehe Received: via spool by 54786-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B54786.165141159031261 (code B ref 54786); Sun, 01 May 2022 13:27:01 +0000 Received: (at 54786) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 May 2022 13:26:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59901 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nl9an-000889-Vs for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 01 May 2022 09:26:30 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:42436) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nl9al-00087u-Em for 54786@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 01 May 2022 09:26:28 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:37428) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nl9ag-00073p-57 for 54786@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 01 May 2022 09:26:22 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:To: From; bh=0bKB3hUg/uju2Vfxj70iJews+mraCPVLh3qUOaGH3+Y=; b=cEEZ5jrpp9ruCby5fCKJ fpsbsjl2WcAMdQ9HQQz//BIzTNVSGvIfUDxoCJSIlxoDhc2FU954UYk4H3LrykFallQeZ0mCqvKq4 RbArbJrrlLccs1KyJoIK6NkCoKzozjV2LA6vlmCb5Z5gSTAjojiW7NPdA9KzpgN6n4mAgoTXCbUEv 4m0PSf/Fp/5kfZEcb+hNTB1us+PFgug69dasDUhoRQzbmxLwUxohRy/BIValxLx3LpeF8G9yLC4Ri 3jH7v/2cb6quFfllaK4hEko8kOpK5EtcLqIuFa3sdoFIklxbJYKHpgxH0fL9XTQkRS5mk+lT6wAa+ 3pi89HUhJOL7EQ==; Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=38902 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nl9af-0000VW-Ne; Sun, 01 May 2022 09:26:21 -0400 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= References: <87r167rjhv.fsf@gnu.org> <87v8vjwqzk.fsf@gnu.org> <87zgk5brkd.fsf@gnu.org> <87y1zpaud6.fsf@gnu.org> <87mtg3655a.fsf@gnu.org> <875ymqwwq8.fsf@gnu.org> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 12 =?UTF-8?Q?Flor=C3=A9al?= an 230 de la =?UTF-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Sun, 01 May 2022 15:26:20 +0200 In-Reply-To: <875ymqwwq8.fsf@gnu.org> (Mathieu Othacehe's message of "Sat, 30 Apr 2022 15:02:07 +0200") Message-ID: <875ymp4c5f.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 54786@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-To: larch@yhetil.org X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1651411644; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=0bKB3hUg/uju2Vfxj70iJews+mraCPVLh3qUOaGH3+Y=; b=NahOIHNHkdG58vevfhtV7DFMCBBCCMETz7ay/sUjNbmp3X1VnEd0AUUJRLwxEjjv6Y2jD3 dg7BhouACe9v+j+fBOPuLR5fQa9Iqd7cM/E7DVgtTVPKRahZGJOrSL7btMp2OGrCibUwpI CkbLT6/f5JJCb55xRDEMCd9VEd+WzSCQ/VRFVAolz30XQ8ZgNq8X3fH/lObRRxa0POUUBT sf6gOkYCMMiXINqwe29gwxKhujRmUi1h8L71HvEB6IZhwxzYk/Njs7I1YPWcJnhk3RLZR3 cB8AqJAhBPyj9RXMg4ufz1an+PTlFnWawbNnYifJDaqnhGXiwO4IY7Uu0H1pmw== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1651411644; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=Np1FH18xzhPnd7gEjx1WFEoLXLlc5AqHqBc9cV7HFG9N5Oc5HuvCJjGqFkNcoN42lhEyIR f0LtB72XjJ5WnMIzYRGJ0nRM5JmQE4cfF3eDcwPSipJFIhXVW/akfhZJrRN0cpD7NNiB9U xgzcJBbAHYDHoHAOrGUeYX+tDak+12usozxsEQiqcdi5POi+qH9MlUgbSukHVWhNvJ2/yV zvsyOSBVIcHNQt2uvDV2yERUAOK0UT7RX/kPIvJdNq7cdPIUl6A42Pgq1gIuhsl80F26EL oNO6yK2d9NxNR0H5p0OlEJPLkLtKCwuQiKaWWmgqRn/ZxHWG3GXcb24eJZ2J+g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gnu.org header.s=fencepost-gnu-org header.b=cEEZ5jrp; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.39 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gnu.org header.s=fencepost-gnu-org header.b=cEEZ5jrp; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 31D3528D57 X-Spam-Score: -2.39 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: hbxhJ/OPGouv Hi, Mathieu Othacehe skribis: > Thanks for the fix! The jami and jami-provisioning tests are also broken > because of what looks like to be the same issue: > > One does not simply initialize the client: Another daemon is detected > /gnu/store/01phrvxnxrg1q0gxa35g7f77q06crf6v-shepherd-marionette.scm:1:171= 8: ERROR: > 1. &action-exception-error: > service: jami > action: start > key: match-error > args: ("match" "no matching pattern" #f) > Jami Daemon 11.0.0, by Savoir-faire Linux 2004-2019 > https://jami.net/ > [Video support enabled] > [Plugins support enabled] Yes, I noticed that, but I=E2=80=99m not sure how to apply a similar workar= ound. > I think we don't have the right approach here: we should check that the > system tests are passing before pushing series and not adapt the tests > afterwards. Yes, apologies for that. > Historically this was difficult because the system tests were often in a > semi-broken state. Before the Shepherd update the tests were however all > passing (modulo rare intermittent failures). > > As it's not always obvious what's going to break the system tests and > what's not (simple package update can easily break them), it would be > really nice to have mandatory commit verification. > > The mumi/cuirass gateway that has already been discussed could really > help us here. If some people are motivated, we could split the work and > introduce such a mechanism. Yes, I agree; an =E2=80=9Calways green=E2=80=9D =E2=80=98master=E2=80=99 br= anch would be great. Do you have milestones in mind for =E2=80=9Ccommit verification=E2=80=9D? As I see it, the difficulty is that we=E2=80=99ve been looking at a horizon= of features =C3=A0 la GitLab-CI without being quite sure how to get there (apa= rt from deploying GitLab or a similar tool, that is). A first step that comes to mind would be an easier way to set up transient jobsets for a branch (or, ideally, for an issue: the thing would apply patches and create the branch). Thoughts? (Maybe worth moving to guix-devel.) Ludo=E2=80=99.