From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e16b::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms13.migadu.com with LMTPS id qKMFJ3OhMGe/+wAAqHPOHw:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 10 Nov 2024 12:05:07 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e16b::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0.migadu.com with LMTPS id qKMFJ3OhMGe/+wAAqHPOHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 10 Nov 2024 13:05:07 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=debbugs.gnu.org header.s=debbugs-gnu-org header.b=lzuZtbIY; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gnu.org header.s=fencepost-gnu-org header.b=E9ALSZud; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1731240307; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=kmw38MjVXYkohYdr15NrU8xRYk2XKXvupQPn6/Dhb3s=; b=X5Gn61efZuvmJmDYUaYm4QQctCRxPS3GcypK3D/myvZ5Ueqv7deihZhek8BtIbWhwbAJcf e/JzJvEJcO7HhBNobACYJineXzRLB6jiSmK4pMPfokiA6Sj3RpOBLVQbsWe9GUdU3mRMhw t77E2wr+WBLOepHct2gQn85AAODeVAdHkmcOaCXqpEH0YNCOQoK9O3vXhZwVtD2rq4KoPL WAEIW8+xC9sjGDB6pBv4tAB/KBxn8tcgAK/aYMhQ8bygOHTrN/7xO1WMXvykb/FUEOI+mO +IJEm7T5GFbK0twTx9MmFoDE/peo6oGzTxMaiQQ4cUYRCTt9rKmu3W/cILKK4g== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1731240307; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=G9YrGqdY4MrQL4jbks3kOqkbukHBLRqcM8EiWCMuj/5i2C4Crtro4HjrQm2f/oo38Ni+d1 sl9S3RCt1GWEHV+s24eNR8LX43EdaeaUakj5J7aWdUlKvb1vgd9dM6Mw6gOqDbXZsuITV8 JIH8Rx0zaE3pxRZ5oCf7/f+5Y+O/eHAB12LZ33gWvNzD1kIIdgCz1b8xvMs9766G9w+rNa bCMu7f/tUGz1FDe04UcrZxOeh1wBLislB9US5rOBglANCUwaJpGIBj1ts3FSQiuln+bkVA 8tXR3HoUwOUxMFKmnYMBw+97VC/mVWPviTyWsX+nzTUEQDYshFgGx8Kojd7e3w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=debbugs.gnu.org header.s=debbugs-gnu-org header.b=lzuZtbIY; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gnu.org header.s=fencepost-gnu-org header.b=E9ALSZud; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 251216371 for ; Sun, 10 Nov 2024 13:05:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tA6X7-0007Ld-NT; Sun, 10 Nov 2024 06:55:09 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tA6X5-0007KU-E2 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Nov 2024 06:55:07 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tA6X0-0001QZ-2k for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Nov 2024 06:55:05 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debbugs.gnu.org; s=debbugs-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From:To:Subject; bh=kmw38MjVXYkohYdr15NrU8xRYk2XKXvupQPn6/Dhb3s=; b=lzuZtbIYOHIuTwA1qMpO5o1HABhiPdrZ8Lj4KRGb6GxP1nsmu1ahkEQDcbBD+Dzo77zSJu+l/Th7H0MMEmBSfdqOvQC1sGmxM/QlzIZinNYk8oUFLlTvVpN1daeS0FxjVfRfjxgX6Efu/fwWq7WN8x2wn3ydr3VUBDVOmxXTc6zq/VfxJsbNtQ5kH/wU/Us6Z/VDObQxV6reK8JC3FInkdQIH8N7qdyyW66SQiue+vacFhDFH3D29QRpo1yc2jm6IE96k0lr9Bnea01DuABQ6VsggQ3ZPWh4J4YmrV1HmGObVq/LS2uDLmAHN0x3pZQ3r4+cfk2ffANqRfmyNOYy0g==; Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tA6Wz-00066x-UA for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Nov 2024 06:55:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#73181: guix-daemon fails when invoking =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=98guix_?= =?UTF-8?Q?authenticate=E2=80=99?= on the Hurd Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2024 11:55:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 73181 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Cc: 73181@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 73181-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B73181.173123968523459 (code B ref 73181); Sun, 10 Nov 2024 11:55:01 +0000 Received: (at 73181) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Nov 2024 11:54:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56014 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tA6Wi-00066I-KF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Nov 2024 06:54:44 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:46906) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tA6Wg-000661-Ir for 73181@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Nov 2024 06:54:43 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tA6Wb-0001PU-84; Sun, 10 Nov 2024 06:54:37 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From; bh=kmw38MjVXYkohYdr15NrU8xRYk2XKXvupQPn6/Dhb3s=; b=E9ALSZudfAVaGb1Vifq5 cg05SaUuAFNosC3JrZLuq+Uf2NX8VqMrExZk6nn7YLQ0j4aAYp9EALtS5p5tVgxewNxEllJqBsqFD DIFGqMDKEKAAUdXJozct2L+vVkjrGC0rKqMzFNyWseK2Prfxk7w8/fpsQOvq0nf6oVtcFHzY7eUiO GWZE+2U1Tl1pB8Rmyk9SbbhFKd16Ym8AU3XNmES7ilak9onByV1f+Ll3t86y9A4Hxx+GsX+NJM1JF imtEDTJMjpcFEHH4cwdHjh+IgiO1aoNjl9EeQOi6/5eAxEmwWfnw83Fe1ful2ief33L3OIyR86OCo VfR/2ugAJBhUBw==; From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= In-Reply-To: <871pzphemc.fsf@gnu.org> (janneke@gnu.org's message of "Tue, 05 Nov 2024 16:41:47 +0100") References: <87o74u5hcy.fsf@inria.fr> <87a5ge5d94.fsf@gnu.org> <87h68snkzk.fsf@gnu.org> <874j4n5s02.fsf@inria.fr> <87ed3phqfm.fsf@gnu.org> <877c9hzsjy.fsf@inria.fr> <871pzphemc.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2024 12:54:33 +0100 Message-ID: <875xovwbgm.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -3.34 X-Spam-Score: -3.34 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 251216371 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx13.migadu.com X-TUID: 0zI3Oi7HibzL Hello, skribis: >>> Anyway, using this patch 0001 it seems that suppressing the warnings >>> works, I no longer get >>> >>> "GC Warning: Repeated allocation of very large block (appr. size 112 >>> KiB):\n\tMay lead to memory leak and poor performance\n" >>> >>> >>> but still get >>> >>> unexpected build daemon error: stoi >> >> Damnit. Could you check with rpctrace what the daemon receives? >> >> I wonder if I misunderstood what the root cause is. > > Yes :-( I captured a `guix offload test' run, see attached. [...] > task31(pid198)-> 2058 (4) =3D 0 22<--9(pid198) > 22<--9(pid198)->exec_startup_get_info () =3D 0 134517280 134512692 352 = 237568 16777216 0 "/gnu/store/7wgwfsbvq8m9zkz03d27ij53jciliz9n-guix-1.4.0-2= 7.3d399e5/libexec/guix/guile\0\\0/run/current-system/profile/bin/guix\0auth= enticate\0" "SHELL=3D/gnu/store/dm5shwb20i38wqdkmyqvhqfi0hmq1lr1-bash-5.1.1= 6/bin/bash\0XDG_CONFIG_DIRS=3D/root/.guix-profile/etc/xdg:/run/current-syst= em/profile/etc/xdg\0PKG_CONFIG_PATH=3D/run/current-system/profile/lib/p" { = 16<--25(pid198) 13<--27(pid198) 13<--27(pid198) 4<--32(pid198) 12<= --33(pid198)} { 11<--34(pid198) 6<--35(pid198) 2<--36(pid198) 26<--3= 8(pid198) (null) (null)} {18 0 0 0 0} [...] > 26<--38(pid198)->proc_setmsgport_request ( 44<--48(pid-1)) =3D 0 (nu= ll) > 26<--38(pid198)->proc_set_arg_locations_request (17014228 17014248) =3D= 0=20 > task31(pid198)-> 3204 (1) =3D 0 pn{ 19} > task31(pid198)-> 3215 (pn{ 19} 49) =3D 0=20 > task31(pid198)-> 3204 (1) =3D 0 pn{ 20} > task31(pid198)-> 3210 (pn{ 20} 1) =3D 0=20 > 26<--38(pid198)->proc_handle_exceptions_request ( 49<--51(pid-1) 5= 0<--52(pid-1) 5 {75 31 31 31 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19291280 23 0 21548192 0}) =3D= 0=20 > thread46(pid198)-> 2068 (3 51) =3D 0=20 > task31(pid198)-> 3206 (pn{ 19}) =3D 0=20 > task31(pid198)-> 2023 (17031168 20) =3D 0=20 > task31(pid198)-> 2023 (17027072 24) =3D 0=20 > 6<--35(pid198)->dir_lookup ("gnu/store/81ffz0prarfczr408ydnps31jf72s5ly= -glibc-cross-i586-pc-gnu-2.39/share/locale/locale.alias" 4194305 0) =3D 0 1= "" 51<--47(pid198) Does that =E2=80=98locale.alias=E2=80=99 file exists? Did you try several LC_ALL=3Dxxx values to see which one would work and which one wouldn=E2=80=99t? So after all, there may be two issues: the =E2=80=9CRepeated allocation=E2= =80=9D thing, and a locale issue. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.