From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add psutils.
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 00:10:18 +0100
Message-ID: <874ni7sdgl.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <201301202333.31367.andreas@enge.fr>
	<201301212145.56116.andreas@enge.fr> <87sj5u5f8l.fsf@gnu.org>
	<201301232107.44760.andreas@enge.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:33795)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1Ty9Sc-0000AU-3F
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 18:10:27 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1Ty9SW-0004I0-Hv
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 18:10:26 -0500
Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.82]:14751)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>)
	id 1Ty9SW-0004Hj-Ac
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 18:10:20 -0500
In-Reply-To: <201301232107.44760.andreas@enge.fr> (Andreas Enge's message of
	"Wed, 23 Jan 2013 21:07:44 +0100")
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
Cc: bug-guix@gnu.org

Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> skribis:

> Am Montag, 21. Januar 2013 schrieb Ludovic Court=C3=A8s:
>> Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> skribis:
>> > Is this not exactly how bsd-style operates?
>> Yes, but it=E2=80=99s only for BSD-style licenses.
>
> Finally I think we agree.

Nitpicking is what I do on my spare time.  ;-)

> I was suggesting to create something analogous to bsd-style, just with
> a different name. But maybe bsd-style is enough, as the description is
> sufficiently vague: "This is a BSD-style, non-copyleft free software
> license."
>
> Fontconfig poses the same problem: They use something that looks=20
> essentially like the MIT/X11 license, but with a slightly different=20
> wording.
>
> So shall we create a new category, and if yes, under which name? Or shall=
=20
> we use "bsd-style" for anything that does not fit?

I would say the latter, because the former is going to be an endless
endeavor.  The URL passed to =E2=80=98bsd-style=E2=80=99 gives more details=
 anyway.

How does that sound?

Ludo=E2=80=99.