From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: bug#15194: hop FTBFS Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 14:19:46 +0200 Message-ID: <874na71icd.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87sixw5dxx.fsf@tines.lan> <87mwo3mtci.fsf@gnu.org> <87k3j75glw.fsf@tines.lan> <87haebgo1v.fsf@gnu.org> <87k3j43qpx.fsf@tines.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34581) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VFNgP-00069N-Nf for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 08:20:15 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VFNgJ-0002ic-As for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 08:20:09 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:50503) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VFNgJ-0002hL-6X for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 08:20:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VFNgI-0000Yl-JW for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 08:20:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87k3j43qpx.fsf@tines.lan> (Mark H. Weaver's message of "Thu, 29 Aug 2013 21:35:54 -0400") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Mark H Weaver Cc: 15194-done@debbugs.gnu.org Mark H Weaver skribis: > ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > >> Mark H Weaver skribis: >> >>> ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: >>> >>>> It turns out Hop & Bigloo have to be upgraded in lockstep. I believe >>>> a new Hop version is around the corner, so I=E2=80=99m tempted to just= wait >>>> for that. >>>> >>>> WDYT? >>> >>> I think we should find a solution that doesn't lead to the 'hop' build >>> being broken every time 'bigloo' is upgraded before 'hop'. >>> >>> An obvious solution would be to keep two versions of 'bigloo': the >>> latest release, and the release that corresponds to the latest release >>> of 'hop'. Hopefully these would be the same most of the time. >> >> Yes, that sounds like a plan. And hopefully the =E2=80=9Cold=E2=80=9D B= igloo would just >> differ by its =E2=80=98version=E2=80=99 and =E2=80=98source=E2=80=99 fie= lds, which is easily handled. >> >> Would you like to propose a patch? > > I don't actually use 'bigloo' or 'hop' myself, and right now I have my > hands full with a lot of pending work for Guile, so I'd prefer to let > someone else take care of this. Message received. ;-) I used by super powers to fix it in ffc1074. Thanks! Ludo=E2=80=99.