From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dave Love <fx@gnu.org>
Subject: bug#21111: possibly bogus in binary tarball
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 12:55:13 +0100
Message-ID: <874mkwcspq.fsf@pc102091.liv.ac.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46422)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1ZHsd5-0001hN-BT
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 07:56:08 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1ZHsd0-0004XV-At
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 07:56:07 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:54671)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1ZHsd0-0004XP-7U
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 07:56:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1ZHscz-0003if-Td
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 07:56:02 -0400
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.21111.B.143756613014255@debbugs.gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46236)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <d.love@liverpool.ac.uk>) id 1ZHscL-0001cl-79
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 07:55:22 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <d.love@liverpool.ac.uk>) id 1ZHscG-0004Ds-2t
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 07:55:21 -0400
Received: from bhsophx.liv.ac.uk ([138.253.100.116]:45081)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <d.love@liverpool.ac.uk>) id 1ZHscF-0004CI-Tm
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 07:55:16 -0400
Received: from bhsophx.liv.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 2D059C2B62
	for <bug-guix@gnu.org>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 12:55:14 +0100 (BST)
Received: from mxg.liv.ac.uk (mxg.liv.ac.uk [138.253.100.62])
	by bhsophx.liv.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27141C2B59
	for <bug-guix@gnu.org>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 12:55:14 +0100 (BST)
Received: from mailhubd.liv.ac.uk ([138.253.100.81])
	by mxg.liv.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1)
	(envelope-from <d.love@liverpool.ac.uk>) id 1ZHscE-00058x-49
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 12:55:14 +0100
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=mailhubd.liv.ac.uk)
	by mailhubd.liv.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1)
	(envelope-from <d.love@liverpool.ac.uk>) id 1ZHscE-0005Jj-3G
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 12:55:14 +0100
Received: from pc102091.liv.ac.uk ([138.253.102.91] helo=albion)
	by mailhubd.liv.ac.uk with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from <d.love@liv.ac.uk>) id 1ZHscD-0005Jf-UA
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 12:55:13 +0100
Received: from dlove by albion with local (Exim 4.82)
	(envelope-from <dlove@albion>) id 1ZHscD-00062U-O9
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 12:55:13 +0100
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: 21111@debbugs.gnu.org

The timestamps in the guix-binary-0.8.3.x86_64-linux.tar.xz tarball are
all at the epoch, so unpacking it spews messages like

  tar: ./var/guix: implausibly old time stamp 1970-01-01 01:00:00

I guess that's not intentional, but if it is, it's probably worth a note
in the installation instructions.