From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: bug#22020: Guile-SDL 0.5.2 test failure i686-linux-gnu Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2015 12:49:59 +0100 Message-ID: <874mg5m3dk.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1448577083.28162.7.camel@openmailbox.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59562) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a30VX-00043O-Mx for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 06:51:08 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a30VS-0007Jo-NB for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 06:51:07 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:40865) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a30VS-0007Jk-Ki for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 06:51:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a30VS-0007nQ-Gu for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 06:51:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <1448577083.28162.7.camel@openmailbox.org> ("Luis Felipe =?UTF-8?Q?L=C3=B3pez?= Acevedo"'s message of "Thu, 26 Nov 2015 17:31:23 -0500") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: bug-guile-sdl@gnu.org Cc: 22020@debbugs.gnu.org Hello! On GNU Guix, we=E2=80=99re seeing one 100% reproducible test failure on i686-linux-gnu: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- /gnu/store/isxqjfaglyfsbcv75y8qbqbph8v28ykr-bash-4.3.39/bin/bash: line 5: = 838 Segmentation fault (core dumped) HAVE_TTF=3D1 HAVE_MIXER=3D0 sh z= ow ${dir}$tst FAIL: gfx.scm _FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/misc/ _FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/TTF/ _FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/OTF/ _FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/Type1/ _FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/100dpi/ _FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/75dpi/ _FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/misc/ _FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/TTF/ _FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/OTF/ _FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/Type1/ _FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/100dpi/ _FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/75dpi/ PASS: fading.scm =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D 1 of 9 tests failed (2 tests were not run) Please report to bug-guile-sdl@gnu.org =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- (Note that we run tests with the Xvfb server. See .) The backtrace is mildly informative: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- $ gdb $(type -P guile) core GNU gdb (GDB) 7.10 [...] (gdb) bt #0 0xf4d98130 in SDL_imageFilterSubByteMMX (Src1=3D0x5d , Dest=3D0xffb429c8 "]",=20 SrcLength=3D4107944472, C=3D152 '\230') at SDL_imageFilter.c:2185 #1 0x09cfd470 in ?? () Backtrace stopped: previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?) --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- That SrcLength is so high suggests it might be an integer overflow. This is with SDL_image 1.2.12. To reproduce with Guix, run: guix build guile-sdl -s i686-linux --keep-failed Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.