From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: bug#29363: Single test failure building Guix
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 16:55:23 +0100
Message-ID: <874lpp3pxw.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <89edb4cc307bfae5db7812abe3b4a37a@mykolab.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33250)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1eGoQZ-0001tW-0C
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 10:56:12 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1eGoQU-0004w9-3U
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 10:56:07 -0500
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:40565)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1eGoQU-0004v8-00
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 10:56:02 -0500
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1eGoQT-0000Dt-Jt
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 10:56:01 -0500
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.29363.B29363.1511193327786@debbugs.gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <89edb4cc307bfae5db7812abe3b4a37a@mykolab.com> (Rutger Helling's
	message of "Mon, 20 Nov 2017 11:08:59 +0100")
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix/>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "bug-Guix" <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Rutger Helling <rhelling@mykolab.com>
Cc: 29363@debbugs.gnu.org

Hi Rutger,

Rutger Helling <rhelling@mykolab.com> skribis:

> test-name: dead path can be explicitly collected
> location: /tmp/guix-build-guix-0.13.0-10.0b4c385.drv-0/source/tests/store=
.scm:178
> source:
> + (test-assert
> +   "dead path can be explicitly collected"
> +   (let ((p (add-text-to-store
> +              %store
> +              "random-text"
> +              (random-text)
> +              '())))
> +     (let-values
> +       (((paths freed) (delete-paths %store (list p))))
> +       (and (equal? paths (list p))
> +            (> freed 0)
> +            (not (file-exists? p))))))
> actual-value: #f
> result: FAIL

I didn=E2=80=99t experience this on my laptop.  Is it reproducible if you r=
un
=E2=80=9Cguix build guix=E2=80=9D a second time?

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.