From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: bug#31330: guix a2cfe broken after update from ~month old guix: util-linux-2.31.1: unbound variable Date: Tue, 01 May 2018 15:38:43 +0200 Message-ID: <874ljrsdgc.fsf@gnu.org> References: <12328266-473d-5b87-cb39-7768432b7814@uni-bremen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41251) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fDVUn-0000Rq-R0 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 01 May 2018 09:39:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fDVUk-0000TT-Mb for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 01 May 2018 09:39:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:36941) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fDVUk-0000TH-JF for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 01 May 2018 09:39:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fDVUk-0007G0-Ck for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 01 May 2018 09:39:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <12328266-473d-5b87-cb39-7768432b7814@uni-bremen.de> (Martin Castillo's message of "Tue, 1 May 2018 14:38:01 +0200") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Martin Castillo Cc: 31330@debbugs.gnu.org Hello Martin, Martin Castillo skribis: > I updated guix (on guixsd) from a version from about beginning of april > to a2cfe. > After that, guix system (and other commands depending on it) give me a > backtrace. Did you update with =E2=80=98guix pull=E2=80=99? The issue reported at could lead to partly-compiled sets of modules, which in turn could lead to errors like what you describe. I=E2=80=99m working on a fix. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.