From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id 1hMFGyEUxF8ucQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 21:35:29 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id cKZzFiEUxF+lOgAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 21:35:29 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06324940363 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 21:35:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:36228 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kjULw-000072-0B for larch@yhetil.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 16:35:28 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35974) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kjUKa-0007jl-V7 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 16:34:04 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:41236) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kjUKY-0002Zp-52 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 16:34:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kjUKY-00012l-1i for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 16:34:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#44953: lsof: LTlock test consistently fails (possibly due to btrfs) Resent-From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2020 21:34:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44953 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Mark H Weaver Cc: 44953@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: bug-guix@gnu.org, 44953@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.16066855973959 (code B ref -1); Sun, 29 Nov 2020 21:34:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Nov 2020 21:33:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52782 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kjUJp-00011m-0H for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 16:33:17 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:60138) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kjUJn-00011f-Fq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 16:33:15 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35806) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kjUJn-0006u3-8e for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 16:33:15 -0500 Received: from tobias.gr ([2a02:c205:2020:6054::1]:57746) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kjUJl-0002Ks-1h for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 16:33:14 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tobias.gr; s=2018; bh=awLYcMJp3wtgYf7DYBiJ17Zp/ro5qgz1k0r1aHB+VEI=; h=date:in-reply-to: references:subject:cc:to:from; b=A09MKSgPNZ39fe1caQomcVPTMSDedGL8Q9Dj2 RWL+8vOEBO44a7gmoSui8R1c/8hZ5b2ZzcQZJfj2t7ygWCRbyQmFLwjSD5Bw5xkCdzzOso dNi+9ZeyuI1Hkm6xnr71QP007SId8X5a9/uKyG8mkp8jTVSFEE23mgO4YfQL06IWcuK4J/ zmEApcJFG9kQ5s9Ob8qh6e+Vtho9B9SyS45pyCqe2h4nQnnXS8t+tJORsfsS7Bszuy16RH wwFZCkOd+WOgCEYY5NaaF/ry6CGTYeyLNddMz/nq/26kyJYsWZ8zt7EXHkhpNm9gcfkELI hCrUaIWuKjPnkhJvxXnWNyh2A== Received: by submission.tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 23d08061 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Sun, 29 Nov 2020 21:33:22 +0000 (UTC) BIMI-Selector: v=BIMI1; s=default; References: <87zh2zdgfh.fsf@netris.org> In-reply-to: <87zh2zdgfh.fsf@netris.org> Message-ID: <874kl7zw4u.fsf@nckx> Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2020 22:33:05 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a02:c205:2020:6054::1; envelope-from=me@tobias.gr; helo=tobias.gr X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" Reply-to: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -4.38 X-Scanner: ns3122888.ip-94-23-21.eu Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (headers rsa verify failed) header.d=tobias.gr header.s=2018 header.b=A09MKSgP; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-TUID: tZMvBhk3Ymvd --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mark, Mark H Weaver =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > In the 'lsof' test suite, the 'LTlock' test consistently fails=20 > on my > system, possibly related to the fact that I use 'btrfs' for my=20 > local > filesystems. Thanks for the report! I can reproduce this by formatting a btrfs=20 image file and loop-mounting it to /tmp. This looks like an upstream bug to me. Do you have time to file=20 one? We're using the upstream=20 since Victor Abell retired. Alternatively we could disable this test in Guix =E2=80=98for now=E2=80=99 = with a=20 comment--but we both know how long it will remain unfixed. Side note: I tried to implement upstream's test workflow[0] but=20 got new failures (i.e. we're not running all the tests yet). I=20 haven't tried fixing those yet. Kind regards, T G-R [0]:=20 https://github.com/lsof-org/lsof/pull/144#issuecomment-732204193 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIMEARYKACsWIQT12iAyS4c9C3o4dnINsP+IT1VteQUCX8QTkQ0cbWVAdG9iaWFz LmdyAAoJEA2w/4hPVW15IcAA/0Q+oA76FwdyxAASLpvDtTBJJIZuivTWpLs1dCMI KPtWAQDBYcCYfqjkTTw9tFviD11U38ePYC3oxSE1RlBgt0AhAA== =msE2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--