From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id uImvCZLZ/l9XGgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 11:29:22 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id 2jh1BZLZ/l9RFwAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 11:29:22 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E7869403E8 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 11:29:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:45146 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kzeL0-0007OY-Re for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 06:29:18 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38640) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kzeKk-0007Mb-3m for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 06:29:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:51204) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kzeKj-0000Iv-Sv for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 06:29:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kzeKj-0006Cw-PC for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 06:29:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#45836: cups-service-type duplicates lp group Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 11:29:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45836 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Leo Prikler Received: via spool by 45836-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B45836.161053732823826 (code B ref 45836); Wed, 13 Jan 2021 11:29:01 +0000 Received: (at 45836) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Jan 2021 11:28:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34517 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kzeKV-0006CE-Vy for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 06:28:48 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:45442) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kzeKR-0006Bi-7e for 45836@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 06:28:46 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:54767) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kzeKK-00008I-Mj; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 06:28:36 -0500 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=37312 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kzeKK-00083k-BS; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 06:28:36 -0500 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= References: Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 12:28:34 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Leo Prikler's message of "Wed, 13 Jan 2021 02:09:23 +0100") Message-ID: <874kjlcbz1.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 45836@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.36 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 7E7869403E8 X-Spam-Score: -1.36 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: CbYgNR8VyCTR Hi Leo, Leo Prikler skribis: > it has come to my attention due to the recent reporting of #45830 and > some conversation in IRC, that cups-service-type adds an lp group, > which is already defined in %base-groups. Since both share the same > definition, this is not too big an issue, but it prohibits us from > using a hard error for #45770. > > I can currently think of two solutions: Either remove the lp group from > cups-service-type or remove it from base-groups. Neither sounds > particularly awesome. Perhaps we could also delete identical > duplicates before asserting that there are none for #45770, but that > sounds like a little much effort. Any ideas how else to solve this? I=E2=80=99d be pragmatic here: 1. Ignore duplicates that are identical (don=E2=80=99t report them). 2. Remove =E2=80=9Clp=E2=80=9D from %base-groups since it has no use with= out CUPS (right?). Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.