From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id iSxFIEzqC2CPEwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 23 Jan 2021 09:20:12 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id iHWbG0zqC2C7CAAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 23 Jan 2021 09:20:12 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBD0E9402C8 for ; Sat, 23 Jan 2021 09:20:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:44656 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l3F5W-0001Zt-IK for larch@yhetil.org; Sat, 23 Jan 2021 04:20:10 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39416) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l3F5O-0001Zl-M3 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Jan 2021 04:20:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:50334) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l3F5O-0007bd-En for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Jan 2021 04:20:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l3F5O-00026P-7t for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Jan 2021 04:20:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#44112: SBCL is not reproducible Resent-From: Guillaume Le Vaillant Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2021 09:20:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44112 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: zimoun Received: via spool by 44112-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44112.16113935988067 (code B ref 44112); Sat, 23 Jan 2021 09:20:02 +0000 Received: (at 44112) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Jan 2021 09:19:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33647 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l3F5K-000263-BZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 23 Jan 2021 04:19:58 -0500 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:35203) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l3F5I-00025p-Me for 44112@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 23 Jan 2021 04:19:57 -0500 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 506FF2400FF for <44112@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 23 Jan 2021 10:19:50 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1611393590; bh=yCMO7mJwHJu/yWff0Sf26rZ4yCx6dEpGm03q2KniEvU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=GLkqsVgp2WNcqR7Lu6UdKeYKdyvLipetvRTT48si3HqspackcKpGVrEeC2Fk0OSf0 ZWKvqY/ULG0LeZ9n9Yq0cx6BXeLF6P+HlAIMqzEXZVtEOHARA1ORM9VaFr6XE9Z2sq YaA/DqKnMZVwGv1ui/bytyHvf15pz5xwz9fBvTx41i8DHGSbrzSwlR9T4iyfvtrHpV PNIHqO6GREySkcfbB06r71WEt3pAyeKu4l7Ocxd4xTYZ/Rzk+fupa5j7GFVqVsNl9c MCvG6seWof15WtdAWXpfVyi+ke9m5ZPrZZZNdxCzTO/a0aWyZLUH9S0lzAOnLIsKWk yul2JOzOIto0A== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4DN9ZD2tf9z6tmF; Sat, 23 Jan 2021 10:19:46 +0100 (CET) References: <86o8kw80bl.fsf@gmail.com> <87wnzjzr77.fsf@yamatai> <86r1mg98la.fsf@gmail.com> User-agent: mu4e 1.4.14; emacs 27.1 From: Guillaume Le Vaillant In-reply-to: <86r1mg98la.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2021 10:19:37 +0100 Message-ID: <874kj8ko2e.fsf@yamatai> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 44112@debbugs.gnu.org, Pierre Neidhardt Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.85 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=GLkqsVgp; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (strict)" header.from=posteo.net (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: EBD0E9402C8 X-Spam-Score: -2.85 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: S2ojxH8txwnK --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable zimoun skribis: > Hi, > > On Wed, 21 Oct 2020 at 14:41, Guillaume Le Vaillant wrot= e: >> zimoun skribis: >> >>> Using Guix 58af4c9, the package =E2=80=99sbcl=E2=80=99 seems not-reprod= ucible. > > [...] > >> Removing this source file timestamp from compiled files would simplify >> things. Maybe nothing really depends on it and it would be possible... > > Any news from upstream? Still unreproducible for me. > > > All the best, > simon So far Slime still uses the function getting the source file timestamp, so these timestamps can't be removed from SBCL. A patch for Slime would be accepted (see [2]), but as far as I know nobody has worked on it yet. [2] https://github.com/slime/slime/issues/583 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIUEAREKAC0WIQTLxZxm7Ce5cXlAaz5r6CCK3yH+PwUCYAvqKQ8cZ2x2QHBvc3Rl by5uZXQACgkQa+ggit8h/j+WYgD/U5Pvxf1b08a5766PhJYlnBeD9rT6rRXaMoGa mbGi5pIA/iGkqIHaAr7lzuKm+PHRtmkyJNTh3VLtymrt5Jyx2aoY =HZ/Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--